I was more just wondering if David would need some help from the rest
of us?
/Anne
On 17. aug.. 2009, at 10.37, Richard Hirsch wrote:
As I said in a previous email, I'm assuming that a branch would be
easiest way for @dpp to get started.
D.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Anne Kathrine
Petterøe<[email protected]> wrote:
David,
I would say we have all agreed that G2 is the way forward.
How you thought about how we proceed from here? Who does what?
/Anne
On 12. aug.. 2009, at 09.15, Vassil Dichev wrote:
Actually, I think this is an extension to microblogging.
If I microblog:
tcw: dickh re: #ESME standup time: 30min
todo: add different authentication to #ESME
working on: #ESME authentication
done: #esme authentication
over the course of a day, those updates are meaningful to humans,
but can
also be parsed and used to update structured data.
In fact, the idea is not new. Take a look at twitterdata.org :
"...simple, open, semi-structured format for embedding
machine-readable, yet human-friendly, data in Twitter messages...".
That totally defines what we want to do with actions.
Granted, you won't see as much interest in processing messages on
Twitter as in a corporate environment, but @rtm, @timer and
@iwantsandy are still quite popular.
I also don't see this as something that replaces what ESME currently
is, but as a way to extend ESME. Most likely the change wouldn't
even
be noticeable, like when Google introduced Calculator- there's no
change in the interface, but if you typed "2+2" or "123 in hex" or
"sin(pi/4) ^ 2", the result would get evaluated.
Vassil
