I like #1 better than #2 but I liked having etch in solid blue. I like the line under #1 better than #2. ________________________________
From: Scott Comer (sccomer) Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 9:17 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: missing pictures...] nice, #1. i really like it. etch committers, any comments? are we ready to vote? scott out Thien wrote: Hi, Didn't do much, I only added more blue to the start of the gradient. I think solid underline might be better, since the logotype already has gradient, another one for the underline seems over and it also steal some attention off the logotype. https://scm.ops4j.org/repos/ops4j/laboratory/users/thien/etch/visuals.pn g Thien On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:58 AM, scott comer <[email protected]> wrote: the less floaty is good. it also adds some terminal emphasis, like, OK! the color gradient suggests ink drying, or perhaps invisible ink being revealed. i like it. i like #3. wife suggested that the gradient on the word etch have more blue at the start. #4 would be good, too, but i think it weakens the impact of the underline. that could be good because we do not want to suggest too much finality (heh, etched in stone). i think we are very close. thanks so much for your effort, thien. scott out
