Thanks for all the excellent feedback. I am duly chagrined that I
mis-interpreted the function of the identification field. 



Thanks again!
Ben Carter
Network Analyst
Douglas County PUD
1151 Valley mall Parkway
East Wenatchee WA, 98802
Voice: (509) 884-7191
Fax:    (509) 884-0553
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guy Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 4:40 PM
> To: Ben Carter
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] IP Identification number
> 
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 04:25:32PM -0800, Ben Carter wrote:
> > If this question has already been answered I apologize for my
inability
> > to find it in the mailing list archives or the FAQ..
> >
> > Is it possible to display the IP identification number in the main
> > display?
> 
> There is no mechanism for doing that, although there is a tap
mechanism
> to allow arbitrary fields to be shown in the summary output in
> Tethereal:
> 
>       hostname$ man tethereal
> 
>               ...
> 
> 
>            -z  Get Tethereal to collect various types of statistics
> and
>                display the result after finishing reading the capture
>                file.  Currently implemented statistics are:
> 
>                       ...
> 
>                -z proto,colinfo,filter,field
> 
>                Append all field values for the packet to the
> COL_INFO
>                information line.  This feature can be used to append
>                arbitrary fields to the COL_INFO line in addition to
the
>                normal content of the COL_INFO line.  field is
>       the
>                display-filter name of a field which value should
> be
>                placed on the COL_INFO line.  filter is a filter string
>                that controls for which packets the field value will be
>                presented on COL_INFO line. field will only be
>       presented
>                on the COL_INFO line for the packets which match
filter.
> 
>                NOTE: In order for tethereal to be able to extract the
>                field value from the packet, field MUST be part of the
>                filter string. If not, tethereal will not be able
> to
>                extract its value.
> 
>                For a simple example to add the "nfs.fh.hash" field to
>                COL_INFO for all packets containing the "nfs.fh.hash"
>                field, use
> 
>                -z proto,colinfo,nfs.fh.hash,nfs.fh.hash
> 
>                To put "nfs.fh.hash" on COL_INFO but only for packets
>                coming from host 1.2.3.4 use :
> 
>                -z "proto,colinfo,nfs.fh.hash &&
>                ip.src==1.2.3.4,nfs.fh.hash"
> 
>                This option can be used multiple times on the command
>                line.
> 
> > This will be very helpful when examining UDP video streams for
> > missing packets (these packet captures can be 120,000+ packets).
> > Better yet, is there any way ethereal can raise some sort of flag
when
> UDP
> > packets arrive out of order or are missing?
> 
> Given that there is no notion of "out of order" or "missing" UDP
packets
> - UDP has no sequence number to allow an order to be determined or to
> indicate that there are gaps in traffic - no, there is no way it, or
any
> other program that deals with captured network traffic, could ever do
so
> for arbitrary UDP packets.
> 
> It might be possible for dissectors for particular protocols running
*on
> top of* UDP to do so if *those* protocols had some form of sequence
> number.  However, no such dissector has, as far as I know, any feature
> such as that.


Reply via email to