Hi John Our project has a few objectives. 1. A program which will scan the bus and configure all the IO ready for the code below. 2. An emulator for a old program language which was used on a Z80 control board. 3. Implement a language bases on state/event principle for current and future projects. 4. Implement a interface for compiled modules to be loaded easily.
After the first release we will probably implement a kernel module to driving the IO as fast as possible. I really need my question I sent in the last week answered but as this time no one has responded. :( Mike On 3/03/12 11:52 PM, John Erlandsson wrote: > Awsome! > > Would you mind giving me a short description of the project? > > //John > > On 2012-03-03 03:50, Mike O'Connor wrote: >> Hi John >> >> Not as yet, hope fully with in 4 to 6 weeks it will be on github >> >> Mike >> >> >> >> >> >> On 03/03/2012, at 1:27 AM, John Erlandsson <j...@lunatech.se >> <mailto:j...@lunatech.se>> wrote: >> >>> Hi Mike! >>> >>> How cool that you are producing a tool kit. Can i read about its >>> progress somewhere? >>> >>> //John >>> >>> On 2012-03-02 03:55, Mike O'Connor wrote: >>>> Hi john >>>> >>>> My reason for posting my questions in the last few days is for >>>> exactly this reason. Once finished we will be publishing a tool kit >>>> under a open source license >>>> >>>> Mike >>>> >>>> >>>> On 02/03/2012, at 12:43 PM, John Erlandsson <j...@lunatech.se >>>> <mailto:j...@lunatech.se>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am curious as to know if there is a way of using your EtherCat >>>>> master for automation purposes, without Simulink. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What I basically want to do is: Describe the bus in a >>>>> configuration file, and assign names to the I/O. >>>>> >>>>> I then want them to be imported and declared somehow in a C++ >>>>> application. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Like TwinCat, but with C++ and Linux... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The reason for this is that I think it would be awesome to do >>>>> industrial automation in C++. To actually abstract machines and >>>>> subclass them, instead of reusing code snippets. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Could someone give me a dumb-ed down version of how this could be >>>>> done? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Does anyone have a better idea of using the master? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is it even a good idea to use userspace applications? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Appreciate any help. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> //John >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> etherlab-users mailing list >>>>> etherlab-users@etherlab.org <mailto:etherlab-users@etherlab.org> >>>>> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> etherlab-users mailing list >>> etherlab-users@etherlab.org <mailto:etherlab-users@etherlab.org> >>> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > etherlab-users mailing list > etherlab-users@etherlab.org > http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users _______________________________________________ etherlab-users mailing list etherlab-users@etherlab.org http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
