On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 01:31:41PM NZDT, Gavin Lambert
<gavin.lamb...@tomra.com> wrote:
I'm not talking about the AX4000. I'm talking about a different slave which
does work happily with SYNC0 and SYNC1 occurring simultaneously. (Though it
too is expecting one SYNC1 pulse per SM packet.)
With the specific parameters 250000, 5000, 750000, 0; what (conceptually)
happens is this:
1. time 5000 : SYNC0 #1 (we assume the zero time is the DC start base
for the network; YMMV)
2. time 255000 : SYNC0 #2
3. time 505000 : SYNC0 #3
4. time 755000 : SYNC0 #4 and SYNC1 #1
Roger that. I was picking up on the "with no shift between them" from your
earlier message and conflating that with the (confusing) Beckhoff Infosys docs
which show S1 starting from same time reference as S0 (i.e. same phase). I see
my interpretation of the ET1100 docs agrees with yours, which is a relief :)
Cheers,
Tom
_______________________________________________
etherlab-users mailing list
etherlab-users@etherlab.org
http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
