At 3:19 Uhr +0100 11.02.2005, Quentin Mathé wrote:
Le 10 févr. 05, à 17:49, M. Uli Kusterer a écrit :
At 15:29 Uhr +0100 10.02.2005, Quentin Mathé wrote:
For compatibility with Freedesktop thumbnails
specificationS I have done the same for the
icons, but it isn't really needed probably.
http://jens.triq.net/thumbnail-spec/index.html
Well, for the icons I could see how it'd
technically be handy. But of course with
OpenStep having bundle identifiers, it seemed
kind of strange for application icons. But I
guess if it keeps us compatible with
Freedesktop, that's handy.
Yes, it is not really useful for application
icons, I will need to do a choice here.
Well, the advantage of keeping it this way and
hashing the pathname is that it could be used
both for non-GNUstep apps (Emacs, Mozilla, etc.)
as well as that it could be used *by*
Freedesktop-aware programs (given they are
extended to support this). Both of which would be
kind of handy, IMHO. So maybe just leave it this
way.
I should do that and have it included in -base
GNUstep specific stuff which compiles directly
on Cocoa normally hmm but I will need to write
a different version for Mac OS X probably so it
will probably stay outside of -base.
Yeah, sounds likely. Wasn't there some kit with
MacOS X ports of GNUstep-extensions somewhere?
--
Cheers,
M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere..."
http://www.zathras.de
