On 5/8/07, Quentin Mathé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le 8 mai 07 à 12:38, David Chisnall a écrit : > > > On 5/7/07, Quentin Mathé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > > >> - better framework documentation > > > > Yup. I would like to make up-to-date and accurate documentation a > > requirement for moving something into stable, at some point if not > > right now. > > I'm fine with such drastic measure, I just love documentation :-). > But it's may be too extreme right now if you take in account some > recent modules already in stable don't respect code style and I > initially put code style conformance as a condition for any recent > modules to be moved into stable. OPMLKit is neither documented or > conform to coding style to take an example. > Also documentation is less critical for some frameworks than others. > For example, if CollectionKit is documented, having BookmarkKit > documented isn't be critical at all.
Well, on one side, we have people who want to have a release ASAP and on the other side, we have people who want to make sure everything is right. At this stage, no one is going to be 100% satisfied. By the way, OPMLKit is not used in any components, not even Grr. So we can remove it from -stable if people ask. And I haven't really compare it to this one yet: http://ranchero.com/cocoa/opml/ Both are BSD licensed. Yen-Ju > > Cheers, > Quentin. > > > _______________________________________________ > Etoile-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-dev > _______________________________________________ Etoile-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-dev
