Le 6 juin 06 à 21:33, Banlu Kemiyatorn a écrit :
On 6/6/06, Yen-Ju Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In general, I think it is a good idea to split it into application
and frameworks part.
And personally, I like to have Agenda in Etoile.
So the only question of mine is why do you want to host the
application
and framework in different places ?
If the integration is what you concern,
Only the UI integration is concerned. For instances, I probably
have some
custom views and use icons that don't fit in etoile's guideline.
Étoilé's UI guidelines are mostly unwritten right now :-)
Hosting them
in different places should benefit the idea of regulating the
reusability of the
APIs and also collaborations and competitions between projects and
people.
Well possibly. It may make your work harder having deal with two
different repositories for this project. Anyway I'm fine with hosting
parts of Agenda in Étoilé repository if this code provides new
features we are interesting in and we have no objections to its design.
As a side note, there is a generic "querying frameworks loosely based
on sqlite" in Étoilé : it is only supported for Cocoa, since
SQLClient (part of GNUstep) provides such SQLite support now.
Thanks,
Quentin.
--
Quentin Mathé
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Etoile-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss
