David Chisnall: > The FreeBSD ports take approach 1. There are a load of etoile-* > packages and an etoile metaport that just depends on them all. It's a > bit more work, but since Dirk has already done it once you can > probably steal a lot of his effort (for example, he has, I think, got > all of the dependencies correct).
Sweeeet, that should help a lot. I count 50+ ports there...I don't know that _that_ much granularity is needed (no offense to Dirk). But maybe that's the easiest way to do it once you start splitting it out. I'd like to go a bit simpler, something like: framework (etoile-core?), apps that could stand alone without Etoile (perhaps e.g. azalea, azdock, melodie, iterm, mollusk, stepchat, babbler, typewriter), helper apps that only make sense within Etoile (etoile-applets? etoile-tools?), and the meta. So about 10 packages instead of 50. Of course, the question is whether or not I'm correct in presuming some of the apps can stand apart from Etoile, and determining which those are. Thanks, Tim _______________________________________________ Etoile-packaging mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-packaging
