> something like: framework (etoile-core?), apps that could stand alone > without Etoile (perhaps e.g. azalea, azdock, melodie, iterm, mollusk, > stepchat, babbler, typewriter), helper apps that only make sense within > Etoile (etoile-applets? etoile-tools?), and the meta. So about 10 > packages instead of 50.
Am I correct in thinking that the stuff in Developer isn't necessary unless you're going to write code? If so then I think this package structure may work: etoile-core: Frameworks, Languages \ etoile-services: Bundles, Services/Private } etoile (meta-pkg) <appname>: stuff in Services/User / etoile-dev: Developer >From looking over dependencies in FreeBSD ports, all internal dependencies are >for stuff within Frameworks and Languages, so etoile-services and <appname>s >would depend only on etoile-core here. Where is the window manager stuff in the 0.4.1 tarball? I don't see anything that seems like a reference to Azalea or another wm. Thanks, Tim _______________________________________________ Etoile-packaging mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-packaging
