>>there is no law against having an illegal recording, > > OK, I'll bite. It's true that the express terms of the statutes > typically address the copying and not, for the most part, > possession. But to get a copy, you had to engage in some sort of > transaction with someone who made the copy for you.
Only sort-of true. You have to engage in some sort of transaction with somebody who already has a copy. They need not be the person who made the copy, nor need the copy have been made for you. (Consider, for instance, buying a bootleg in a store.) Seth _______________________________________________ etree mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mail.etree.org/mailman/listinfo/etree
