Yes, I would say about the same thing, except replace redhat with
Mandrake. I personally dont like redhat, but mandrakes version works
pretty good. I would also add that slak is a good option for sub pentium
boxes, since recent versions of suse and mandrake are i586 compiled.
Jamie
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Dean Ridgway wrote:
> Greetings everyone,
>
> It is getting close to the time when I do my semi-annual update of the Mid
> Willamette Valley LUG web pages. I was thinking of adding a section reviewing
> the various Linux distributions. If any of you would like to write a short
> paragraph (or even just a few sentences) stating why you choose whatever Linux
> distribution you use I would appreciate it.
>
> For example, my own entry will probably go something like:
>
> Back in 1995 when I first started getting interested in Linux, Slackware was
> the only distribution carried by the local software store that I frequented.
> Since then I have stayed with Slackware partly because it is what I am used
> to and partly because of its reputation for rock-solid stability.
>
> Because Slackware is a little less polished than some of the other
> distributions it is a great learning tool. If you just want to run Linux,
> Redhat or SuSE are great distributions. If you want to get your hands dirty
> and learn how and why things work on a Unix-like OS, then get Slackware.
>
> /\-/\ Dean Ridgway | Two roads diverged in a wood, and I-
> ( - - ) InterNet [EMAIL PROTECTED] | I took the one less traveled by,
> =\_v_/= FidoNet 1:357/1.103 | And that has made all the difference.
> CIS 73225,512 | "The Road Not Taken" - Robert Frost.
> http://www.peak.org/~ridgwad/
> PGP mail encouraged, finger for key: 28C577F3 2A5655AFD792B0FB 9BA31E6AB4683126
>
