<rant laughing="with_not_at"> Uhh, sorry I didn't mention it. I was not hung up on it!! I was thinking of testing scenarios, and was not worrying about providing it full bandwidth for any extended period of time, so there you have it. Not making sense? Think "bursts". The word "home" was used, and I considered that many new desktops and some nicer laptops allow 4GB or more of memory.
So memory, I don't give a crap about how slow the disks are, sorry :) If anyone in Eugene does have a disk array that can provide 10Gbps, please invite me/us over, of course. To the rest of us: yes, good luck with those crappy spinny things!! Oh, you got a fancy 15K RPM? Well, big deal, but a better choice than driving an overpriced car! ;) </rant> ben On 2/21/07, Mr O <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Still missing the fact that the drives can't keep up. I've used fiber at home and while it is faster than 100Mbps it is only as fast as the drives could read and write. --- Ben Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be awesome to see this card benched on the quad-core > designs from both Intel and AMD -- I hear AMD is about to > shine > brightly again :) Throughput has been overlooked for too > long, > and their memory management approach seems like it will scale > far better. Sorry to get offtopic, I'll prolly get a ticket > for wandering > in the median! ;) > > ben > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Get your web address owned. Have a PIGGY new year through Yahoo! Small Business. http://smallbusiness.yahooreallyreallysucks.com/domains/?p=WORSTDEAL _______________________________________________ EUGLUG mailing list euglug@euglug.org http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
_______________________________________________ EUGLUG mailing list euglug@euglug.org http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
