|
I'm afraid I'm going to have to revise my opinion of
Dan Brown - and in both directions. It turns out I have a copy of
Deception Point. I didn't even realize it until this discussion had
already been milked dry. I'm now on p.49.
He is a good enough writer that I started to think in
terms of some dark, sinister publishing conspiracy. I now believe that
there are certain bestselling authors who write 250-page novels that wouldn't
insult your intelligence (or not by much), but then the manuscript gets turned
over to an editor/ghostwriter who pads it out to another 250 pages, so that the
spine of the book will be wide enough for an eye-catching point-size for the
author and title. (In the case of this novel, the point size for "Dan
Brown" on the spine is at least half again larger than for the title. He
has become a brand.)
As long as they are adding pages, they provide mental
wheelchair ramps as well. Like dumbed-down explanations of characters'
motives that seem to have been amply illustrated by earlier dialogue and
action. Like a purple cast to much of the prose - with a few minor
grammatical errors along the way, of course. Like gratuitous sex and
violence. (In this novel, there's a campaign strategist who is very
beautiful, and very smart, who has been seduced ONCE by the candidate she's
working for, who has ended that brief affair, but who continues working for
him. Incredible? Well, it's a stretch. But what's really
incredible is that she continues working for him FOR FREE. Y'know, to get
job experience?)
It's hard to explain Dan Brown otherwise. He's
great. Then he sucks. Then he's great again. It doesn't make
sense. Dan Brown wrote ALL of Deception Point? Hah! That's
what they WANT you to think. ;-)
So he's a good writer - or can be, anyway.
Unfortunately, the technology picture is even worse than I thought. The
novel starts fictionally with "Author's Note", which says,
"All technologies described in this
novel exist."
Not very far into the novel, you're treated to the
description - supported by a breathlessly defensive citation to a 1997 article
in Discovery - of a mosquito-size MEMS flyer. It's an RPV that can be
controlled deep inside a building from a kilometer away, that can resolve
acceptable images of its environment and transmit them wirelessly to the
operator, and that can recharge itself by parking near a magnetic field, such as
that of a generator. Um, yeah. Right. There used to be this
crazy Russian around Tokyo who was convinced that the government of the CIS was
out to get him - with mosquitoes. He was terrified of mosquitoes.
Now I know what kind.
I'll probably wolf down the rest of it, and enjoy
it. Hey, sometimes I go to Macdonald's for lunch. Their fries ain't
half bad, and the burgers are exactly what I've come to expect since childhood,
and that's a comfort sometimes. Deception Point is Macdonalds-class
writing, with some high-end espresso and biscotti from the upscale cafe next
door. And that kind of thing has its place.
However, I don't expect to learn much about
astrobiology. I now understand why the review that brought this subject up
said that fact-checking the entire novel would be a big task. If it's as
densely technological as the first 50 pages, and as off-base technologically as
the first 50 pages, there's a small book's worth to be written about how Dan
Brown gets it wrong. And what would be the point?
-michael turner
|
- Fw: Latest News from the Astrobiology Magazine LARRY KLAES
- Fw: Latest News from the Astrobiology Magazine LARRY KLAES
- Fw: Latest News from the Astrobiology Magazine LARRY KLAES
- Fw: Latest News from the Astrobiology Magazine LARRY KLAES
- Fw: Latest News from the Astrobiology Magazine LARRY KLAES
- Fw: Latest News from the Astrobiology Magazine LARRY KLAES
- Fw: Latest News from the Astrobiology Magazine LARRY KLAES
- Fw: Latest News from the Astrobiology Magazine LARRY KLAES
- Fw: Latest News from the Astrobiology Magazine LARRY KLAES
- Re: Latest News from the Astrobiology Magazine Michael Turner
- Fw: Latest News from the Astrobiology Magazine Michael Turner
- Fw: Latest News from the Astrobiology Magazine LARRY KLAES
- RE: Latest News from the Astrobiology Magazine Reeve, Jack W.
- Re: Latest News from the Astrobiology Magazine Joe Latrell
- Re: the latest splat Michael Turner
- Re: the latest splat Gary McMurtry
- Re: the latest splat DPrice
- Re: the latest splat Michael Turner
- Re: the latest splat Gregg Geist
- Fw: Latest News from the Astrobiology Magazine LARRY KLAES
- Fw: Latest News from the Astrobiology Magazine LARRY KLAES
