EV Digest 6932

Topics covered in this issue include:

  1) Re: Understanding Motors II
        by Danny Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  2) Re: bruhless motor's
        by Victor Tikhonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  3) My ideas invention  cooling tube design which uses the flowing air over a 
vehicle to power a cooling tube whic cools the inside of a car.
        by GWMobile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  4) Re: Internal Resistance?
        by "John A. Evans - N0HJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  5) Auto Transport Companies ??
        by William Brinsmead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  6) Re: Auto Transport Companies ??
        by "John G. Lussmyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  7) Re: Wrecks
        by William Brinsmead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  8) TdS Report #9: Photos - Tour de Sol Highlights and Where Do We Go From 
Here?
        by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  9) Re: High Speed Electric Winch
        by Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 10) Re: Auto Transport Companies ??
        by "mike young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 11) Re: Max motor temperatures and temp sender install
        by "Richard Acuti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 12) Re: Internal Resistance?
        by Steve Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 13) Was: Invention to  cool the inside of a car. 
        by Michael Barkley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 14) Infrared coating and airsuspension packagesSubjects for faqs
        by GWMobile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 15) Re: thundersky cells for cheap, prices
        by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Begin Message --- Also for a fixed resistance, heat is the square of current. Double the current and the heating in the wire goes up 4x.

There is also a less dramatic effect where hotter copper has a slightly higher resistance than cold copper. The added resistance will further increase the heat generated.

Danny

Jim Husted wrote:

Hey Rob

No it doesn't.  Stall that same motor and you're all
but shorting the batteries so to speak and it'll make
huge amps and lots of smoke 8^o

Amps equal heat, so the more amps you draw the hotter
the motor's going to get.  The racers take that same
motor and throw 2000 amps at it, but just for a couple
sec's or less.  The higher the current the shorter the
duration, that is unless you can cool the motor and
wisk away the heat (blower motors running air through
the motor) which extends the duty cycle time.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I have Siemens ACW-80-4 PM synchronous motors available.
If you consider inverter as "external part of the motor"
(commutator) it becomes brushless DC since you feed DC into
inverter.

Its data is in the first row in this table:
http://www.metricmind.com/motor.htm

Victor

Jeff Major wrote:
Hi Owen,

By "brushless", I guess you mean brushless DC motors,
or permanent magnet synchronous machines, PMSM. http://www.uqm.com/index.html
UQM makes a nice brushless product.  Not sure where
you could just one.  And they are pricey.

And, yeah, they are good for EVs.

Jeff


--- owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

can anyone tell me if brushless are any good for an
ev and where to get one from thank's
owen



____________________________________________________________________________________ Got a little couch potato? Check out fun summer activities for kids. http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- My ideas invention cooling tube design which uses the flowing air over a vehicle to power a cooling tube whic cools the inside of a car.



www.GlobalBoiling.com for daily images about hurricanes, globalwarming and the melting poles.

www.ElectricQuakes.com daily solar and earthquake images.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Is anyone else actually able to view the posts with this notice? I may be mistaken, but I think I've seen some replies with original content in them.

john

Joseph Tahbaz wrote:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*         ---REMAINDER OF MESSAGE TRUNCATED---            *
*     This post contains a forbidden message format       *
*  (such as an attached file, a v-card, HTML formatting)  *
*       Lists at  sjsu.edu only accept PLAIN TEXT         *
* If your postings display this message your mail program *
* is not set to send PLAIN TEXT ONLY and needs adjusting  *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
 Hi All ,
 I have seen this discussed in the past but it is probably out of date
by now. Does any one have experience with auto transport companies ? I
need to get a quote to ship a EV to be form Indiana to Nevada, there is
just a bewildering glut of them on the web. I am hoping that some one
knows of a few good companies left.


Thanks Bill Brinsmead



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
At 12:35 PM 6/22/2007, William Brinsmead wrote:
 I have seen this discussed in the past but it is probably out of date
by now. Does any one have experience with auto transport companies ? I
need to get a quote to ship a EV to be form Indiana to Nevada, there is
just a bewildering glut of them on the web. I am hoping that some one
knows of a few good companies left.

I've used Kiwi's Karriers out of Port Townsend, WA twice to move a Sparrow. Seemed to do a good job, on time.

--
John G. Lussmyer      mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dragons soar and Tigers prowl while I dream....         
http://www.CasaDelGato.com

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- This has probably been covered before, but for conversions if you cannot find a suitable clean car with a dead engine how about buying a popular (especially with the street racing crowd) clean late model that runs well with relativity low mileage and advertising the engine, with all the ice accessories and maybe the tranny too, on something like
Craigslist? I would think that with an engine running well and smogged
too, that since they could drive it first you would get top dollar, and
if you are lucky they would do the labor of removing it too.


Bill Brinsmead

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
TdS Report #9: Photos - Tour de Sol Highlights and Where Do We Go From Here?

Photographs from the Tour de Sol:
        http://www.AutoAuditorium.com/TdS_Reports_2007/photos_003.html


Tour de Sol Highlights and Where Do We Go From Here?

Few of us are priviledged to have the truely long view of how an idea comes
into being, grows, materializes into reality and take on a life of its own.
<P>
At the awards ceremony for the 21st Century Automotive Challenge we heard Nancy
Hazard review the American Tour de Sol from its incarnation to its present
hiatus.
<P>
Here are the slides along with the text of that presentation, provided by Nancy.


Hello, I am Nancy Hazard of World Sustain.  I was involved
with the Northeast Sustainable Energy Association's (NESEA) Tour de Sol from
its start in 1989.  That first year I was a volunteer.  I later became the
director, and worked on it for 18 years.  Ollie Perry, Director of the new 21st
Century Automotive Challenge has graciously asked me to talk about my
perspective of the highlights of the Tour de Sol, and suggestions of what I
think needs to be done to continue to move forward the issues promoted by the
Tour de Sol.

In 1987 Urs Munwyler stared the Tour de Sol competition in Switzerland.  In
1988, Rob Wills, PhD candidate at Dartmouth College traveled to that event with
the Dartmouth solar car team.  Upon returning, folks at MIT and Dartmouth got
to talking about how it would be great to have an event like the Tour de Sol in
the USA. Rob sat on the NESEA board, and so he proposed that they take it on.
NESEA was interested, and they received permission from Urs to create the
American Tour de Sol.  This photo shows Dr. Robert Wills starting the Dartmouth
car in the first Tour de Sol that started in Montpelier, May 1989. The purpose
of the event was to showcase what Photovoltaics (PV) can do.  Although I knew
that PV created electricity from sunlight, I can still remember this moment.
I found it tremendously moving and exciting to see a car go down the road using
energy created from the sun that I was instantly hooked!


At the time, I had been building ``solar homes'' because I was deeply troubled
by the fact that our world had been built on oil -- a finite resource.  These
graphs show the production of oil from specific wells -- from discovery, to
developing the equipment to pump the oil.  In each case we can see the growth
of productivity of the well, the peak, and then the falling of productivity.
This is typical of all oil wells.  It is called Hubert's curve, and when we
aggregate all the oil wells of the world we can expect the same curve -- and in
fact we are seeing this pattern today.  Most people agree that the world oil
production is at the peak, commonly referred to peak oil.  But the demand for
oil is growing dramatically!  So the need to change the world is more urgent
than ever At that time, I wanted to work on getting the world off of oil, and
when I learned that transportation uses 2/3rds of all the oil used in the US, I
immediately decided to switch from building to the Tour de Sol.

Rob Wills was fond of saying that all he wanted to do was ``change the world.''
When the Clean Air Act was passed in 1990, California began talking about
creating a program that would require the auto makers to build and sell a
certain number of electric vehicles in California if they wanted to keep
selling conventional vehicles in that state.  And so the mission of the Tour de
Sol changed.  We felt that to change the world, we needed to offer practical
vehicles that people could use on a daily basis -- and our vision was electric
vehicles (EVs) charged by renewably produced electricity!  In my mind it seemed
a lot easier to reduce oil use in transportation than from buildings because a
car is an ``appliance'' that most people replace every 10 years.  All we needed
to do is to get the autos to make a more efficient appliance, an electric
appliance, and for people to buy them.  As it turned out this would be much
more difficult than I ever imagined!


We formed an advisory group of participants and others and we talked about how
we were going to ``change the world'' with the Tour de Sol.  We decided we
needed to demonstrate what was possible.  Therefore we needed to inspire
everyone to get involved in building the vehicle of our dreams -- students,
auto manufacturers, engineers, hobbyists We needed funds to support our effort
-- and we wanted the auto companies, our government and electric utilities to
get involved -- so we invited them to enter the competition and become sponsors
-- and many of them did!  And we wanted to educate politicians and the general
public, so we mounted major media campaigns around each annual event -- calling
for participants, and then promoting the event itself, its entrants, sponsors,
and its successes.

Creating the scoring system was our tool to get the vehicles built that we
wanted to demonstrate.  We started with the Swiss Tour de Sol Rules book, which
was very detailed about safety issues, but was not oriented to practical
vehicles, so with a committee lead by Rob Wills, who had become the Technical
Director of the Tour de Sol, each year we revised the Rules Book, as well as
the scoring system.  Technical testing and safety were important components of
the event from the start.  The Swiss event focused on reliability and range.
Power could only come from electricity produced by PV on the vehicle, or on a
separate PV charging station brought to the event.  As we moved to practical
vehicles, the cars charged from the grid, and driving range became a major push
of the event.  While many felt that 50 miles was adequate, auto companies and
most consumers were not convinced.  Efficiency was added to the scoring system
at some point.  The electric utility companies were interested in understanding
how EVs might affect the electric grid, and so we were able to recruit Bob
Goodrich, head of Northeast Utilities R&D, to build us a charging trailer
(really a distribution system -- a trailer with lots of receptacles and
instrumentation on the receptacles.). The charging trailer got its electricity
from a ``convenient'' transformer on an electric utility pole -- a rather
expensive connection, but worth it to the utility companies.(Later we resorted
to a biodiesel-powered generator.) We revised the trailer many times and
finally moved the data collection system from the trailer to individual house
meters that entrants were responsible for hooking into their recharging
systems.  Efficiency led to very light vehicles, and so we added the autocross
event to ensure that the vehicles were robust enough to withstand daily
practical use and be safe.  Around 2000 we added climate change emissions to
the scoring system.  We worked with US DOE's Argonne National Laboratory so
that we could quantify the climate change emissions from various fuels.  While
this all made the scoring system tremendously complicated, and Rob and others
struggled with the mechanics of spreadsheets and databases and producing
accurate scoring results in a short time span, we felt strongly that we had to
judge the vehicles in this way.  Nobody else was doing this work!  For several
years we ran gasoline vehicles in the event so that we would have data that
could compare conventional vehicles to these new vehicles.  The data we
collected was used by many non-profits.  By this time we had all kinds of
vehicles in the competition -- but I'm getting way ahead of myself!

While the event grew from 6 entrants in 1989 to over 50 entrants, I'm going to
tell the story of the entrants with just a few examples.  Solectria Corporation
was the early hero of the Tour de Sol.  James Worden, who was often referred to
as the ``Henry Ford of EVs,'' and Anita Rajan, MIT student soon to be wife of
James and President of Solectria, founded Solectria Corporation in 1980 with
other MIT students.  The first vehicle MIT entered is on the left with James in
white.  This is the solar vehicle that went to the Swiss Tour de Sol and the
first few American Tour de Sols.  The vehicle on the right James fondly refers
to as his ``tin box.''  James built this electric car as a high school project,
and he used it to commute from his home in Arlington to MIT while he was in
college.  This was the first purpose-built EV that I had seen!  James' sister
is standing next to the car.

Solectria's first purpose-built EV was the Lightspeed -- in the center.  It is
flanked by its bread and butter product -- Geo Metros converted to electric
propulsion.  Anita is in the front row far left, James is between the yellow
and red cars, Andy Haefitz is to his right, and Gill Pratt is on the far right.

Solectria's entries were always an incredible draw for the media.  Each year
their entries would break their previous records.  Range records of 50 grew to
100, 150, 200, and then 250 miles on a single charge!  Solectria paid
incredible attention to efficiency.  Their GeoMetro's routinely drove one mile
on 150 Watt-hours or less.
At 10 cents a kilowatt hour, that translates to 0.7 cents
per mile for fuel!  In the heyday of the Tour de Sol news of the Tour de Sol
was carried on network news, over 300 news article were printed, and it was
estimated that there were over 100 million media impressions!

We also started a conference -- the first and only solar and EV conference in
the country for many years.  NESEA held many conferences for builders and
architects at the time, so this seemed like a logical step.  At first we saw
the conference as a way to get more Tour de Sol entrants -- by offering past
and future entrants an opportunity to share information and enthusiasm.  The
Symposium grew into the largest EV conference in the country with a trade show
with auto and bus manufacturers, component manufacturers, and start-up
companies such as Solectria and Solar Car Corp.  The last conference NESEA held
was in New York City.  It drew over 600 attendees.  Then the EVAA (Electric
Vehicle Association of the Americas), know today as the EDTA (Electric Drive
Transportation Association), started holding an electric vehicle conference --
and it continues to hold an annual conference on electric-drive vehicles.  The
EDTA is the trade organization and lobbying arm of those interested in
electric-drive vehicles including auto makers, battery manufacturers, electric
utility company, hydrogen fuel cell advocates and others.

Bob Stempel put the NESEA conference on the map by accepting our invitation to
keynote our conference in 1992 when he was chair of General Motors.  At that
conference he met James Worden, and they formed a relationship that enabled
Solectria to receive Geo Metro gliders (body with no motor).  In 1993 Bob
Stempel moved to Energy Conversion Devices, and worked with Stan Ovshinksy to
create the Ovonic nickel metal hydride battery company.  In this photo, Bob
(back left) joins Solectria Corporation at the 1996 Tour de Sol finish line to
celebrate the success of the Solectria Sunrise, which drove 373 miles on a
single charge using the Ovonic battery system!  This was an amazing
achievement!

Much to NESEA's amazement and surprise, high schools began to build EVs and
enter them in the Tour de Sol!  Peterboro High School in New Hampshire was the
first high school to enter the Tour de Sol in about 1991. This group went on to
create several other beautiful EVs, and other high schools took on the
challenge, and brought amazing entries such as Topher Waring's VW bus efforts,
Earl Billings one-person solar commuter, and Paul O'Brien's fuel cell trike to
name a few.  By 2006, the Tour de Sol had more entries from high schools than
any other single source.

New Hampshire Technical Institute participated for over 10 years, and the
evolution of their entries reflects the growth of the Tour de Sol.  They
started with a solar racing car (top left).  They then built the Sungo, a
practical 2-seater commuter vehicle, with PV on the roof.  This vehicle was
very efficient.  At first it used lead acid batteries, and then the students
began experimenting with the Ovonic nickel metal hydride batteries.  The top
right photo is a vehicle that Tom Hopper, the team advisor and professor
created.  He used this beautiful one-person EV to commute from his off-grid
home to work every day.  After several years he built the trailer so he could
go anywhere -- the trailer had an auxiliary power unit (APU) i.e. a gasoline
engine.  In one amazing NYC to DC event, instead of trailering the vehicle to
the event to participate, he drove to and from the event!  This was a major
demonstration of the practicality of the vehicles we were showcasing!

Electric utility companies had been bringing prototype EVs built by the major
auto makers (OEMs) to the Tour de Sol for several years, but when Ford brought
its Ecostar to the Tour de Sol in 1994 it was a watershed year for me.  This
was the first serious OEM entry.  Roberta Nichols, Ford executive and a race car
driver drove the route two weeks before the event with her navigator.  Ford
mounted a major media campaign about their entry, and Roberta was doing radio
interviews around the country whenever she was not driving.  Needless to say
they took first place in the Production Category!  The Ecostar was a beautiful
EV with over 100 miles driving range using sodium sulfur batteries.  These
batteries were popular in Europe, and Ford Motor Company had invested heavily
in them.  In the next year or so, Ford was to experience two fires with this
battery technology, and their EV program started loosing its forward momentum
as they struggled to find suitable replacement batteries.  The starting
ceremony at the World Financial Center in New York City was amazing with over
50 entrants, and many exhibitors including an electric tank from the US
Department of Defense.

In 1998 Toyota approached us and asked if we'd be interested in having their
Toyota Prius -- a new hybrid vehicle that had not yet been introduced into the
USA -- as our Pace car.  To be honest, this offer presented a dilemma for
NESEA. A gasoline vehicle, even an efficient gasoline vehicle, did not
demonstrate our dream of an EV charged by renewables.  In fact, for several
years, we had allowed student hybrid vehicles (HEV) to enter, because the US
Department of Energy (DOE), which was a major sponsor of the Tour de Sol, also
sponsored a collegiate-level HEV competition, and they wanted to offer those
teams more opportunities to compete in events.  We had reluctantly agreed,
since they held the purse strings, and again we reluctantly agreed to Toyota's
proposal for the same reason Pictured here is US DOE Secretary Pena waving the
checkered flag as the Toyota Prius arrived in DC.  To be honest, this was also
an uncomfortable event for the DOE, because they did not want to recognize the
Prius because it was not ``made in the USA.''  In 1999 Honda became a major
sponsor of the Tour de Sol and shared the title sponsorship with the DOE for
the following three years.  In 1999 Honda started showcasing the Honda Insight,
the first hybrid vehicle on the US market, and shortly thereafter the hybrid
Honda Civic.

At long last it became more politically acceptable to talk about climate change
-- and it became more widely accepted that it existed, and that we humans were
the primary cause.

As mentioned earlier, we added climate change emissions to our scoring system.
We also opened the event to all alternative fuel vehicles (AFV) --not just HEVs
using alternative fuels, but all vehicles that wanted to demonstrate how their
vehicles could meet the mission of the Tour de Sol -- which was more clearly
defined as ``reducing oil use and climate change emissions'' later to be know
as our goal of ``zero-zero.''  Needless to say, the opening of the doors was
hotly debated by the advisory committee, and it also resulted in a major
overhaul of the scoring system -- with the goal that we could demonstrate to
the world which path would lead to our ultimate goal of zero-zero.  To avoid as
much controversy as possible, we used USDOE's Argonne National Laboratories
numbers generated by their GREET analysis.  We understood that electricity and
alternative fuels could be made in many different ways, and that the climate
change emissions from these fuels varied depending on their feedstocks, and how
they were made.  Therefore we knew there were warts in our scoring system, but
that they were no easily resolvable.  Eventually, efficiency and climate change
emissions became more than 50% of the score.  West Philadelphia High School was
one of the first teams to enter with an AFV. Here they are receiving Honda's
Power of Dreams Award for their biodiesel Jeep.

When we opened the doors to all AFVs, a whole new flood of innovative vehicles
entered the event.  On the left -- West Philadelphia High School build an eye-
catching kit car, the Attack that was fast and efficient and ran on biodiesel
On the right, University vehicles that had been modified to run on E85 (85%
ethanol and 15% gasoline) began to enter.

The two vehicles that were most exciting to me were the two that really
demonstrated our idea of zero-zero.  The upper left vehicle was built by
University of Wisconsin students.  They converted a ``Sparrow,'' a briefly
produced one-person EV, to be a hybrid vehicle that ran on electricity and
hydrogen.  When parked, they pulled out a PV panel and a small wind turbine to
recharge the batteries and make hydrogen for the next leg of the journey.
Western Washington University's Viking 32 is an amazing car that actually
reduces climate change emissions every mile that it drives!  It is an efficient
purpose-built internal combustion engine vehicle that runs on methane (or
natural gas.) The methane came from the manure at a dairy farm near their
campus.  Since methane is 20 times more effective as a global warming gas as
carbon dioxide, by burning methane and turning it into CO2, it is reducing
climate change emissions as it drives!  While this idea is not cost effective
today, it could be in the near future -- and it is the kind of innovative and
long-term thinking that we need to really change the world!

In 2005, NESEA had to face the fact that the Tour de Sol had major economic
challenges.  The Bush Administration was not interested in alternative fuels,
so we lost our DOE funding.  Our funds from states started drying up as they
became strapped for cash.  The auto companies had moved on from marketing
hybrid vehicles to ``early adopters'' that attended the Tour de Sol to
mainstream marketing.  And schools were also struggling financially so it was
more difficult for student teams to build vehicles, and to come to an event
that was 8-days long!  We therefore changed the event from an 8-day rally that
stopped in 5-12 communities to a 3-4-day ``hub and spoke'' event that had a
home base, with events that went out from that point.  We also sought and found
a partner -- the Saratoga (NY) Automobile Museum -- who helped us reach
mainstream people interested in automobiles.  Two new events were also born to
attract new entrants to the Tour de Sol.  Josh Kerson Run, owner of Run About
Cycles, was interested in sharing information with other companies creating
electric bikes -- and so the Around Town Vehicle event was born.  This event
not only attracted electric bike manufacturers, it also offered students an
opportunity to get involved with a project that was less expensive than a full-
size car.  And it offered the Tour de Sol an opportunity to demonstrate low
impact non-auto travel options -- ``new fun ways of getting around!'' This
event grew to 15 entries within two years.

Jim Dunn, CEO of the Center for Technology Commercialization was the instigator
of another new event -- the Monte Carlo-style Rally & 100-mpg Challenge.  He
recruited Gilles Labelle, Craig Van Battenberg and others to create this
exiting event for hybrid and alternative fueled vehicle owners -- and
challenged them to demonstrate how efficiently they could drive their vehicles!
We were thrilled when the event attracted 50 entries the first year.  It also
included several HEV owners that had modified their vehicles in various ways to
get even better performance -- with turbochargers, or extra battery packs.
Valence Technology brought the first plug-in hybrid (PHEV) to the event in
2005.

In 2006, Hymotion, that offered a PHEV conversion kit for a Toyota Prius or
Ford Escape hybrid, showcased their vehicle -- although they did not compete
because our scoring system was not set up to showcase the advantages of such a
vehicle.

So.  Where do we go from here?  The need has never been greater for changing how
we get around.  The climate crisis, peak oil, war in the Middle East over oil,
the ever growing population and increased cars and demand for energy, and
environmental degradation due to our addiction to fossil fuels is growing all
issues that are looking for solutions.

When I look back on our successes I can see that: we have hybrids and biofuels
on the market; consumers are buying hybrids and asking for more fuel efficient
vehicles; and hundreds of young people have been involved in the event.  Though
we are not in touch with most of them, we are hopeful that participating in the
Tour de Sol touched them in some way, and that whatever they are doing they are
carrying their understanding of the severity of the situation -- and are
working with us toward solutions

Others have also taken up our cause -- maybe not the cause of absolute zero-
zero, but the cause of incrementally working in that direction.  Michelin Tire
Company created the Challenge Bibbendum in 2001 -- an international competition
that challenges the auto companies to demonstrate their  vehicles on the market
today and prototypes that have good environmental performance.
        http://www.challengebibendum.com/challenge/front/affich.jsp?&lang=EN

The Automotive X Prize was announced this year.  It offers a multi-million 
dollar
prize to entrants that bring vehicles that get 100 mpg, meet EPA emissions
standards, and are fun to drive.  Their goal is attract teams from around the
world ``to design viable, clean and super-efficient cars that people want to
buy.''
        http://auto.xprize.org/


But let's take a reality check Read the slide and you will get the sorry
picture of our lack of success in reducing oil use by increasing fuel
efficiency.  What happened?  People bought SUVs and auto makers made them.
Also the number of people and cars has increased over the past 18-years.  If
you take action today and call your Congress people, we can change this by
raising the CAFE standards, and require auto makers to improve the fuel economy
of their vehicles.  Alternative fuels can also be helpful, but I have always
been hesitant to embrace them with exuberance for several reasons.  Firstly -
we have to focus on reducing the need first -- and put more fuel efficient
vehicles on the road, along with campaigns to walk, bike, take mass transit,
car pool, car share, and just drive less Secondly, we have to be ever vigilant
about ``unintended consequences.'' For example, already we have seen at least
two bad consequences of biofuels.  The demand for corn to make ethanol has
driven up the cost of corn so people in Mexico cannot afford to buy tortias,
and New England farmers are going bankrupt because they cannot afford to feed
their dairy cows.  The demand for oil to make biodiesel has already encouraged
people to cut down rain forests so they can plant palm oil trees and make
money.  The net effect is more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.  Look at the
full cycle.  Look at the feed stock.  I have a huge fear that market trends
(like price of vegetable oil) will take this whole thing out of our hands and
spin the world out of control.

If you read this slide you will see that we are on the cusp of beginning to
address and regulate climate change emissions.  This is great news -- but it
will only happen if you take the initiative of call your Congress people and
telling them, and the EPA why they must act today on this issue.


What I see as the largest unmet need -- now that the Tour de Sol is no longer
running -- is a competition that would inspire young people -- and the 21st
Century Automotive Challenge has all the ingredients that offer this to high
school students!  As noted in this slide, I'd prefer an event that had a wide
range of vehicles, like electric bikes and solar/electric off-road vehicles, in
the hope that if the event offered an opportunity to participate with less
expensive projects that more students would compete.  But if there is not a
volunteer to take this on it would be best to let it go.  It is clear to me
that the event, at least for now, has to be low cost.  I do not see money from
the auto companies.  The federal government will not have money until we have a
new administration.  The state government might have some support, depending on
the state.  For a low-cost event, volunteers become more important than ever.
They must now not only be on hand during the event, but volunteers must take on
planning, fundraising, registration, promotion etc. -- as the creators of the
21st Century Automotive Challenge have.  Partnerships also become more
important -- as they enable an event to not only cut costs (no site rental
fees) but also to reach a larger audience than the event organizers could reach
on their own. (examples are the Saratoga Automobile Museum, Burlington County
Earth Fair.)

The Tour de Sol could never have existed without its volunteers.  Volunteers
have shaped the mission of the event, the Rules and the scoring system.
Volunteers do the tech testing, the scoring, the recharging and refueling, the
site decoration, the photography, the public education and much more.
Volunteers worked in each community before the event to create a unique event
that would be exciting and attractive for their community.  Volunteers have
created new Tour de Sol events.  As you can see, the volunteers are the heart
and soul of the Tour de Sol.

Young people are the future.  In addition to the many entries from high
schools, colleges, and universities, NESEA developed curricular materials for
middle and high school students -- everything from a 150 page resource for high
school teachers, to trip tally exercises for elementary school students, the
Junior Solar Sprint for middle school students, and scavenger hunts and more
for classes that wanted to take a field trip to the Tour de Sol.  These
classroom resources are downloadable free from the NESEA web site at
                www.NESEA.org
Click on the K-12 education section.

I want to put the Tour de Sol in context of an overall plan to reduce climate
change emissions.  NRDC (The Natural Resources Defense Council) has a plan to
reduce carbon emissions by 60% over the next 50 years.  This graph shows how we
can lower carbon emissions from the base case of ``doing nothing.'' The slope
at the top represents ``doing nothing'' i.e. ``business as usual' (BAU) The
first ``wedge'' shows how using energy efficient lights and appliances etc. can
reduce our electrical demand and therefore our carbon emissions.  The second
wedge  shows how making our buildings more energy efficient can reduce overall
energy use (by reducing the need for oil, gas, and electricity) The third wedge
is ``our wedge.'' I'll talk more about this in the next slide The fourth wedge
shows how we can reduce carbon emissions by improving the efficiency of our
large trucks and air planes, and by encouraging people to drive less by
implementing smart growth strategies, and making it easier for people to walk,
bike, use mass transit, car pool, or car share.  The fifth wedge is using
renewable technologies to produce zero-carbon energy.  The final and sixth
wedge is the carbon emission reductions that could be achieved if carbon
sequestration technologies were developed.  This technology would capture the
carbon emissions from coal-fired power plants and then bury that carbon
underground.

This graph shows in more detail the challenges that all of the Tour de Sol
entrants are working on.  It shows how NRDC thinks we are going to reduce
carbon emissions from business as usual (BAU) from the transportation sector.
The most amazing thing to me is their prediction that we can cut carbon
emissions from passenger vehicles by 85%! You can see on the right that a
majority (64%) of the overall gains are from vehicle efficiency. 29% is from
switching to less carbon intensive fuels (electricity, natural gas, and
biofuels such as ethanol, biodiesel, and methane instead of gasoline and
diesel.) And 7% is from smart growth -- getting people to drive less.  Since
today in the US, 2/3rds of all the oil is used for transportation, and one
third of all the greenhouse gas emissions are emitted from transportation, the
work that everyone is doing through the Tour de Sol is critically important.

In closing, I would like to thank everyone that has helped with the Tour de Sol
over the many years that I have been associated with it.  Please see slide for
this list.  I would also like to thank those that are carrying the ball
forward.  Ollie Perry, Paul Kydd, past Tour de Sol volunteers, and many others
that I know were working behind the scenes in birthing the 21st Century
Automotive Challenge.


In closing I'd like to show you a photograph taken in 1989 -- at the start of
the Tour de Sol.  The young boy in the foreground is Rob's son Tyler -- who is
now a college student.  I'd also like to share with you an oft-cited quote from
Margaret Mead, renowned sociologist.  ``A small group of thoughtful people
could change the world Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.''

I challenge everyone reading this to pick up the torch and run with it.  The
future is in your hands.


 -      -       -       -
 The 2007 TdS Reports are actually about the "21st Century Automotive
 Challenge" hosted by the The Eastern Electric Vehicle Club (EEVC).
 The complete set of Tour de Sol Reports for 2007 can be found at:
             http://www.AutoAuditorium.com/TdS_Reports_2007
 The complete set of past Tour de Sol Reports can be found at:
             http://www.FovealSystems.com/Tour_de_Sol_Reports.html
 -      -       -       -
 The above is Copyright 2007 by Michael H. Bianchi.
 Permission to copy is granted provided the entire article is presented
 without modification and this notice remains attached.
 For other arrangements, contact me at  +1-973-822-2085 .
 -      -       -       -
 For more on the "21st Century Automotive Challenge", see the web page at
                        http://www.EEVC.info

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Jun 19, 2007, at 12:55 PM, trev scribby wrote:

Below is the power curve for a Honda 9HP motor, i have
the "overseas-ebay equivalent". Not sure exactly how
to read the chart, but hopefully you guys can help.

http://www.trupower.com/honda/270/gxperg270.gif

It looks like you need around 14 ft/lb of torque over a rpm range that an electric motor would be happy with.

How long does the engine/motor operate each pull? This looks like something that a golf cart motor and controller could handle. Beat up old ones with dead batteries are often cheap.

Paul "neon" G.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- you can look at www.movecars.com at auto haulers imfo. i have used DAS (dependable auto shippers) before and had good luck. Mike young ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Brinsmead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <ev@listproc.sjsu.edu>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 3:35 PM
Subject: Auto Transport Companies ??


 Hi All ,
 I have seen this discussed in the past but it is probably out of date
by now. Does any one have experience with auto transport companies ? I
need to get a quote to ship a EV to be form Indiana to Nevada, there is
just a bewildering glut of them on the web. I am hoping that some one
knows of a few good companies left.


Thanks Bill Brinsmead




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Thanks everyone for explaining all of this to me.

I think I'm going to run with the installed temp probe and run lines to a warning light on the dash. Not as precise as a gauge but certainly acceptable to me.

My motor has the vented head so I'll assume that there is an impeller fan on the shaft inside. I think I'll get make a small hose coupling from some thin metal and have it tack-welded to the brush vent. Then I'll install a small squirrel cage fan and run a duct between them. Probably not necessary but certainly won't hurt.

I think I'm also discovering that my driving style may need adjustment. In an attempt to give the motor "rests" and not drive too fast, I've been taking secondary roads. These roads have a lot of traffic lights and a lot of small hills and a low speed limit. It's difficult to keep the motor at it's most efficient speed and the stop 'n start draw a lot of amps. I seem to be better off on the highway maxed out in 2nd gear and maintaining a constant 55-60 mph. Even a steady 65-70 mph in 3rd gear seems to be easier on the equipment than the secondary roads. I'm basing this on the final voltage when I arrive at my destination as well as the motor temp. It'll be easier to tell for sure when my ammeter gets here.

Rich A

_________________________________________________________________
Get a preview of Live Earth, the hottest event this summer - only on MSN http://liveearth.msn.com?source=msntaglineliveearthhm
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Yes, if you get individual emails rather than the digest and your mail
pgm allows you to "view message source" then you can see the original
message.

--Steve

On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 13:26 -0600, John A. Evans - N0HJ wrote:
> Is anyone else actually able to view the posts with this notice?  I may 
> be mistaken, but I think I've seen some replies with original content in 
> them.
> 
> john
> 
> Joseph Tahbaz wrote:
> > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > *         ---REMAINDER OF MESSAGE TRUNCATED---            *
> > *     This post contains a forbidden message format       *
> > *  (such as an attached file, a v-card, HTML formatting)  *
> > *       Lists at  sjsu.edu only accept PLAIN TEXT         *
> > * If your postings display this message your mail program *
> > * is not set to send PLAIN TEXT ONLY and needs adjusting  *
> > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> >
> >   
> 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I'm cooling the inside of my car, with a cooler packed
with BLUEICE packs.  It has a squirrel cage fan
mounted on the bottom side of the cooler, plugs into
the cigarette lighter or the solar panel on the dash
of the car.  The air is pulled in from a small hole in
the top of the cooler, thru the various BlueICE packs,
and out the bottom side.  This has kept the car
comfortable in Texas/Oklahoma weather so far.  Cost
less than $20 bucks to build, it is small enough to
sit in the passenger seat of the car and blow air over
to the driver (ME).  I have frozen packs at work, and
home, and just switch them out as needed during
commutes from work and home. 


--- GWMobile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> My ideas invention  cooling tube design which uses
> the flowing air over 
> a vehicle to power a cooling tube whic cools the
> inside of a car.
> 
> 
> 
> www.GlobalBoiling.com for daily images about
> hurricanes, globalwarming 
> and the melting poles.
> 
> www.ElectricQuakes.com daily solar and earthquake
> images.
> 
> 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
In the past two people have posted
1.
A site that makes glass coatings ofr automotive glass that reduces infrared (heat) transmission from sunlight to almost zero inside a car (reducing the air conditioning requirement considerably)
 And 2.
2. Low cost air suspension add on packages to increase gliders (motorless cars used for conversion) weight carrying ability so they can handle the increased weight of batteries.

Could someone report those two contacts and we could add them to the faq.




www.GlobalBoiling.com for daily images about hurricanes, globalwarming and the melting poles.

www.ElectricQuakes.com daily solar and earthquake images.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello JF
 
In response to your request from someone looking at this from  a business 
analysis prospective.
 
The first points to consider here is the quality of the product and  customer 
support. Cheap prices are only as good as long as your satisfied with  the 
product.
 
If the original buyers of the bad Thundersky cells were given  replacements 
this would do the following. One it would right a wrong that has  been done. 
Two it would give us actual field testing of the product. If they are  as good 
as now claimed we would have a non bias reporting  with real world results.  I 
would consider working on  putting together a group buy only after both one 
and two has been  done. 
 
I have been in business over 20 years in the service industry our  profit 
margin is quite a bit less than your 14% below. This is not a good  comparison 
since I am not stocking millions of dollars of  risky product. There is a 
concern that a new battery or  something else could happen that devalues the 
batteries. It only makes  sense to buy as many as can be distributed as quickly 
as 
possible. If this can  be done there is no reason for a large profit or mark up.
 
It would however require enough people to have faith to be willing to  put 
the money up front. This is what happened before. The group buy is a great  way 
to go with everyone sharing the risk. The benefit is everyone gets a better  
deal and no need for any profit.
 
Thundersky in keeping the name has established a history. If they want to  
change the consumers image here is a good time for them to do it. I was not  
involved in the first buy of the Thundersky batteries so I have no financial  
gain. I did hear enough about it from local EV buyers over the years that I 
will  
not deal with Thundersky until they take care of the existing Thundersky  
customers.
 
Don Blazer
 
 
 
In a message dated 6/22/2007 10:59:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I did the math right, to get the best price on  the 160ah 12V units, (with 
no BMS BTW)
you'd need to buy about 3100 160 ah  batteries
Then if you resold them here with a gross profit of $300 ea, at  about $1000 
ea. you'd end up with $950K to cover costs.

Thats enough to  make maybe a half-million net on a $3.5 million investment 
which is ok but not  an oil well. An old 
China-hand might do better, I suppose. If somebody set  up a co-op with 
pre-purchases and some way of selling say half of 
them  straight to retail, and hired that Old China Hand, you might get the 
co-op  member's price down to 15% over 
wholesale or so, at a WAG.

ASSUMING I  didn't drop a decimal point, and you can sell 3100 batteries in a 
year, and  these TS batts are actually 95% 
good, and somebody else doesn't undercut  your pricing.

No doubt a real business-person could make a much better  analysis.

JF


Tony Hwang wrote:
> Not sure if anyone's  seen this, it's my first time seeing this pricing 
structure.
> 
>  http://www.thunder-sky.com/order_en.asp
> 
> It seems like you can  get these cells for as low as $1.30 per Ah! That's 
pretty cheap. But you'd need  to buy a large quantity. Maybe we can do a group 
purchase, and someone can buy  all of them and then sell them for $1.30 per 
Ah. :)
>  
>                                      - Tony
> 
 



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to