> From: michael.e.r...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:48:33 -0400
> To: ev@lists.evdl.org
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] self-discharge of CALB 180Ah LiFePO4 cells
> 
> What is a BMS?  Very good question.  The small packs I have are a complete
> unknown.  Each cell is wired with a tiny wire so I presume they are making
> an attempt at top balancing (I am told that is a very large assumption).
> They both have low cut offs, and they appear to communicate with the
> chargers they are shipped with so a green light comes on when "charged."
>  In both cases if the chargers were not cutting off they would be reaching
> a voltage that is less than would overcharge any cell in the pack.  One
> cuts off at 56V and the other 60V on 16 LFP cells.
> 

I think we agree, 

Im not 100% sure what you meant, but in general I would not charge LiFePO4 (or 
any lithiums..!) without at least a "cell by cell" individual monitoring that 
CAN take the "oooh shiiit"-emergency control over the charger or regen and cut 
back when any cells conditions is not so normal any more.  

(But I also like a throttle down feature at discharges, when the "oh shit" 
happens as I drive around here in disasterland ).

For example, it will be a potential problem if we charge more than about 4s of 
LiFepo4 cells with a normal lead acid smartcharger and have a 14.0 V cutoff, 
say if 3cells was 50% discharged for any reason, and 1 cell till was close to 
full.

More than 4 LiFePo4 cells in series for chargers with a "total voltage cut off 
only",, will in my experience be bad(and/or dangerous)

Example:
8 LiFePo4 cells in series.  
Charging with a constant.current  & 3.60V per cell constant.voltage = 28.8V 
(28.8 Volt for leadhead-compability here at the list :-)   

Assume we have a situation like this:
6 cells, that still have a some % to go before they reach "full", the voltages 
are for example 3.50 or 3.55V.
2 cells, that are *now* at 3.60V, almost full  ..and they now starts to act 
almost as it was capacitors, the voltage will go up much faster and faster at 
the already full cells.  

-Aha?? So what will the charger do now, in this situation?
It will now continue to push up the poor 3.60-cells trough the roof  @ constant 
full current..
like this example: 
3Cells @ 3.50V = 10.50V
3cells @ 3.55V = 10.65V
Gives a total of 21.15V  
+ the 2 already full cells.

-Aha?  So what voltage will that 2 cells have now, in this example? 
That 2 cells , at the upper limit before, they will be forced up to:
28.8V -21.15V = 7.65V  at  2 cells =  3.82 V each.

-Ooops..  
 So what about my 16Cells pack?
16cells * 3.60V = 57.60 V in total and it was set as the chargers max voltage 
(great, if all cells was good and in a perfect and even top-balance.)

But in this Unbalanced charging example we have:
15cells * 3.50 Volt = 52.5 
1 cell @ ??? Volt. 
Hmm, lets see, we had 57.60 total -  52.5( the 15cells) 
 = That last cell in this example will therefore see 5.1 Volt..

-ugh.. ,  =:-o
 Ok. So what about a 36 Cells pack then? 

Yes, we assume that this charger was set to the recommended 3.650 Volt / cell  
= 131.40 V cutoff.
And the situation was full current charging:
32 cells out of 36 measures at the moment about 3.55V /cell = 113.60 V
But 4 cells did already reach almost full, and now they must go on and share 
the reminding 17.80 V 

= 4.45 V per cell, or maybe even more for some cell.

-Ouch pouch..Oh my dear popcorning antivacuuum bags..! :-/  
    But how about my 96 Cell pack?


/John
                                          
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20140426/07b315e0/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to