Ah, serve me right for reading posts backwards! This is an elegant solution :-) 

John Lindsay

> On 20 Apr 2016, at 4:35 PM, Cor van de Water via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote:
> 
> Ah, I was mistaking the HPWC for the Supercharger,
> but in fact it is the electrically J1772 compatible,
> only mechanically different outlet (sleeker and more flexible,
> due to the use of multiple thinner wires instead of a single
> large gauge wire for each current conductor).
> For that sleek Tesla variant of the J1772 it should be simple
> (read: 3D printing effort) to manufacture a converter to standard J1772.
> 
> The Redneck (no insult intended) way of dealing with this problem
> would probably be to cut off the Tesla plug with 1 foot of cable,
> attach a J1772 plug and recepticle in line and voila: both Tesla and
> all other cars can charge at the HPWC.
> 
> Cor van de Water 
> Chief Scientist 
> Proxim Wireless 
> 
> office +1 408 383 7626                    Skype: cor_van_de_water 
> XoIP   +31 87 784 1130                    private: cvandewater.info 
> 
> http://www.proxim.com
> 
> This email message (including any attachments) contains confidential and
> proprietary information of Proxim Wireless Corporation.  If you received
> this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender.  Any
> unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying of any part of
> this message is prohibited.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Nickerson [mailto:m...@nickersonranch.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 11:38 PM
> To: Cor van de Water; Electric Vehicle Discussion List; Cor van de Water
> via EV
> Subject: Re: [SPAM?] Re: [EVDL] Tesla's (cuckoo) EVSE grants ...
> 
> Hi Cor,
> 
> I'm certain that what you describe or something similar is being used by
> the Tesla owned SuperCharger stations.  The SuperCharger access was
> included in the higher end models, but a purchased option on the base
> model.  Because of that, I'm sure they have authentication on the
> SuperCharger stations.
> 
> However, the HPWC are different.  They are privately owned and often
> purchased by owners for installation in their garage.  Even if furnished
> or funded partially by Tesla, they are still controlled by the local
> business.  The HPWC don't have any network connection of way to
> authenticate or charge for access.
> 
> The way that Tesla did their connector, it is more convenient to use the
> proprietary connector.  Using the J1772 adapter is another part that has
> to be installed and removed, and another step.  The adapter must be
> removed to close the charging access door.
> 
> There are news stories about a prototype HPWC to J1772 adapter being
> tested.  Nothing recently that I saw, though.  See:
> http://longtailpipe.com/2015/11/09/new-ev-charging-adapter-lets-j1772-ca
> r-owners-use-tesla-hpwc-charging-stations-cool-or-theft/
> 
> Mike
> 
> On April 19, 2016 10:05:04 PM MDT, Cor van de Water via EV
> <ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote:
>> I have the suspicion (never even charged at a Tesla station and
>> certainly never been exposed to the protocol) that if the engineers at
>> Tesla are worth their salt, that even though the chargers are not
>> networked, they probably will ask the car to identify itself before
>> starting a charging session,
>> because without such a handshake, what keeps the world from charging
>> for
>> free at the Tesla chargers?
>> It is relatively easy to create an asymmetric encrypted authentication,
>> whereby you can easily check with the public key that it is a valid
>> authentication, without being able to *generate* a valid
>> authentication,
>> since that requires the private key. We do this to avoid hackers from
>> buying the lowest cost version of our product and upgrading it to a
>> higher featured model, since the license key is encrypted in such a
>> way.
>> Tesla can generate keys for their vehicles that are used for the
>> communication with the chargers (and other identification purposes).
>> 
>> So, while it may be a great learning experience to try and
>> reverse-engineer the Tesla charging protocol in similar way that the
>> Leaf was used to record Chademo charging sessions, don't be surprised
>> if
>> there are encrypted messages that will prevent you from even playing
>> back a recorded charging session to a charging station, to lure it into
>> giving you a charge.
>> 
>> Hope this gives some insight,
>> 
>> Cor van de Water 
>> Chief Scientist 
>> Proxim Wireless 
>> 
>> office +1 408 383 7626                    Skype: cor_van_de_water 
>> XoIP   +31 87 784 1130                    private: cvandewater.info 
>> 
>> http://www.proxim.com
>> 
>> This email message (including any attachments) contains confidential
>> and
>> proprietary information of Proxim Wireless Corporation.  If you
>> received
>> this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender.  Any
>> unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying of any part of
>> this message is prohibited.
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: EV [mailto:ev-boun...@lists.evdl.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Brannan
>> via EV
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 8:39 PM
>> To: brucedp5; Electric Vehicle Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: [EVDL] Tesla's (cuckoo) EVSE grants ...
>> 
>> Sounds like a great opportunity for an entrepreneur - that HPWC coupler
>> to
>> j1772 adaptor. Kickstarter or indiegogo?
>> Tom
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:13 PM, brucedp5 via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> With all the coming election noise, and the possiblity of no more
>> EVSE
>>> grants ringing in my ears, on a search I could not find a renewal of
>> the
>>> U.S. Fed grant to cover some of the cost of installing public EVSE as
>>> before.
>>> 
>>> But I found a self-promo news item touting a business' new EVSE. I
>> noticed
>>> their EVSE were two (proprietary) Tesla HPWC EVSE, that no other
>> plugin but
>>> a Tesla EV can use.
>>> 
>>> I sent a message off to the business' contact (a NJ mall), letting
>> them
>>> know
>>> that non-Tesla drivers are going to feel rebuffed, thus they could
>> lose
>>> plugin driver business.
>>> 
>>> They kindly replied letting me know their HPWC EVSE was part of a
>> Tesla
>>> Destination Charging grant (Tesla paid for it). See
>> http://www.teslarati.com/becoming-tesla-destination-charging-participan
> t
>> /
>>> Becoming a Tesla Destination Charging Participant
>>> Feb 25, 2016
>>> [link
>>> https://teslafactory.wufoo.com/forms/q7b8imo1g0og2v/
>>> contact Tesla's Destination Charging program
>>> ]
>>> 
>>> BTW there is no HPWC to j1772 adaptors drivers can buy, so when HPWC
>> are
>>> installed, j1772 L2 drivers are shut-out. While I am not against
>> Tesla,
>>> helping to install 'Tesla-only' (proprietary) EVSE is the same
>> problem
>>> drivers had back in the late 1990's-on.
>>> 
>>> GM would almost give away their inductive (proprietary, wireless)
>> lpi,spi
>>> EVSE, which would displace either one or both of the public EVSE
>> being
>>> installed at a host site, paid for with CA DMV fees (many EVSE sites
>> had
>>> two
>>> spi and no conductive avcon EVSE). This cuckoo approach to public
>> EVSE
>>> domination ...
>>> 
>>> [link
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckoo
>>> Cuckoo ... Many species are brood parasites, laying their eggs in the
>> nests
>>> of other species, ... raise their ... young
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brood_parasite
>>> ]
>>> 
>>> is bad for the EV-cause, unless a HPWC coupler to j1772 adaptor is
>> made
>>> available for plugin drivers to buy. Since HPWC EVSE are
>> non-networked,
>>> buying an adaptor would be paid off with the free L2 charging.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> For EVLN EV-newswire posts use:
>>> http://evdl.org/evln/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> {brucedp.150m.com}
>>> 
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>> http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/Tesla-s-cu
> c
>> koo-EVSE-grants-tp4681606.html
>>> Sent from the Electric Vehicle Discussion List mailing list archive
>> at
>>> Nabble.com.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>>> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>>> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
>>> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (
>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20160419/a90
> a
>> 23fc/attachment.htm>
>> _______________________________________________
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
>> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA
>> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
>> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA
>> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
> 
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to