Looks like the list is throwing away any most my posts with HTML, here's a retry:
This was a good read and they had a video. It shows how the experience at a Tesla supercharger with Magic dock is about is good, or maybe even worse (parking problems) than using another public CCS station: https://www.consumerreports.org/cars/ev-chargers/how-well-do-tesla-superchargers-work-for-non-tesla-evs-a4713673565/ Particularly note the pic of the Lucid charging that needed to block 3 stalls. You can see there's really no way Tesla is going to OK using existing short-cabled V3 pedestals for 3rd party use widespread. On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:00 PM John Lussmyer via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote: > So, it's NOT a technical problem - it's a business/licensing issue. > If Ford (or GM) offers enough money, it could happen. (remember, > Standards aren't) > > On 6/21/2023 12:47 PM, (-Phil-) wrote: > > No. If you read the Official NACS document I linked to a few posts > > ago, the ONLY communications protocol supported is PLC (DIN 70121), > > they do not list the single-wire CAN legacy supercharger protocol in > > any of these released documents because they absolutely will not > > support 3rd party use of it. > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20230621/ac881aa4/attachment.htm > > > _______________________________________________ > Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org > No other addresses in TO and CC fields > HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/ > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20230621/f4b8a943/attachment.htm> _______________________________________________ Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org No other addresses in TO and CC fields HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
