> b) CMIS: > http://www.optaros.com/blogs/alfresco-drupal-cmis-integration-available
Did you see Sally's blog post on CMIS and Plone? http://blog.jazkarta.com/2009/10/27/plone-web-services-what-about-cmis/ > 5) Terabyte storage solutions. Documentum and their DMS-based ilk have > handled this for years. How many large-scale storage Plone case studies are > there on plone.net? Many a time, Plone integrators can't discuss the few > successes that may exist here. Hopefully, this story improves with BLOB > storage in Plone 4. Sasha recently wrote a blog post about large repositories of data being served up from Plone using plone.app.blob. http://valentinewebsystems.com/en/blog/plone-powers-50gb-of-environmental-data We're currently working on a project to build a digital asset management system using Plone, which will be serving terabytes of data. Nate > Matt Hamilton wrote: >> >> On 30 Nov 2009, at 09:18 PM, Dylan Jay <d...@pretaweb.com> wrote: >> >>> These are awesome points. I think unique and challenging reality is that >>> plone is both product and a platform but we've been trying market both >>> through the same channels which is why the message has sometimes been >>> confusing. Eg we say plone is easy to install but in reality only in >>> drvrloment mode not production mode so that is really a platfom message not >>> a product message. >>> Drupal delivers drupal the product message via it's dot com site and it's >>> platform message via it's dot org site. >>> >>> I am also thinking we are better off concentrating on selling plone as a >>> platform. Not just because we need more develepers and integrators to gain >>> greater momentum but recently I've been discovering plone doest sell well as >>> a product. >>> If someone comes to us (as PretaWeb) and says >>> A) we need a website that can blah blah then plone is easy to sell. >>> If a customer comes to us and says >>> B) we're considering to purchase plone as a cms or intranet it's a really >>> hard sell. >>> This is even though we sell training and support and that both solutions >>> would need to be equally customized. Why? >>> People picking products tend to pick product companies. Makes them more >>> comfortable. They feel like they can sue them and that will act more to help >>> them to protect the reputation of the product etc. Plone has no product >>> company. >>> I guess this is why open source works better for platforms than products. >> >> I'm at a show so only a brief reply now, but just say that CMS Watch >> recently recategorised their vendor listings and now split by platform vs >> product and by size. IIRC Plone is in the Mid-range Platform category. Along >> with Drupal and Typo3. Alfresco is in Upper-range platform. Joomla and >> Terminal4 are in Simpler Products. >> >> The CMS Watch stand is near us at the show I'll try and get some feedback >> on their views as to what went into categorising them. >> >> -Matt >> _______________________________________________ >> Evangelism mailing list >> Evangelism@lists.plone.org >> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/evangelism >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Evangelism mailing list > Evangelism@lists.plone.org > http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/evangelism > -- Nate Aune - na...@jazkarta.com http://www.jazkarta.com http://card.ly/natea +1 (617) 517-4953 _______________________________________________ Evangelism mailing list Evangelism@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/evangelism