Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

[Hal Ruhl]

In my [is, is not] definitional pair the "is not" component is the All 
minus the "is" component.

Thus the "is not" member is not simply unwinged horses or the like.  In 
most of these pairs I suspect the "is not" component has no apparent 
usefulness [to most SAS [if they exist]].  Be that as it may both members 
of the [All, Nothing] pair seem to have usefulness.

Hal