Tom Caylor writes: > I believe that my statement before: > > >...simply bringing in the hypothetical set of all unobservable things > >doesn't explain rationally in any way (deeper than our direct > >experience) the existence of observable things. > > applies to the multiverse as well, since > the multiverse = observable things + unobservable things > and equivalently > the multiverse = this universe + unobservable things
Are you saying that you don't agree that the anthropic principle applied to an ensemble of instances has greater explanatory power than when applied to a single instance? Hal Finney
