Except I think that identifying G* with God is unhelpful. God is at best an incoherent concept, which is part of the reason why theology is a problematic word. G* is basically Truth by another name.
Bruno wants to use theology in its original Hellenistic sense - fine, except he will have his work cut out explaining that this is how he intends to use the word. Of course if he picks a completely new word then he will need to explain this as well. Cheers On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:16:29PM -0800, George Levy wrote: > Bruno > I am still thinking about the naming issue and I am not 100% satisfied > with any suggestion. The field we are discussing is really at the > intersection of three subjects: Theology, Physics and Psychology. This > reminds me that about six years ago I wrote a book which was never > published (I did not have the credentials and/or the book was too "far > out" for the editors). I entitled the book "God, the World and I." In > terms of your theory "God, the World and I" may correspond to G*, G and > the first person. > -- *PS: A number of people ask me about the attachment to my email, which is of type "application/pgp-signature". Don't worry, it is not a virus. It is an electronic signature, that may be used to verify this email came from me if you have PGP or GPG installed. Otherwise, you may safely ignore this attachment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- A/Prof Russell Standish Phone 8308 3119 (mobile) Mathematics 0425 253119 (") UNSW SYDNEY 2052 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Australia http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks International prefix +612, Interstate prefix 02 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
pgpa4RXSioiAT.pgp
Description: PGP signature