Le 04-avr.-06, à 19:31, Brent Meeker a écrit :
> > Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> Le 01-avr.-06, à 19:18, 1Z a écrit : > ... >> >> If you believe in absolute QM (or just assume absolute QM I eman QM >> without wave collapse) then, obviously, observers are subject to the >> SWE, and are multiplied or differentiated continuously. > > It may be so, but not obviously. It's part of the Hilbert space > representation > of QM, but alternatives such as Bohm's show that it is not necessary. OK, I should have been more precise. By "pure QM" I mean QM without collapse, and without any addition to the SWE (except comp). Bohm is not QM, for me, it is QM + a guiding Potential (capable of forcing "particles" to select a universe). It is a *different* theory (which, btw, seems to me to need big and ad hoc changes to remain viable in the relativistic case, but that is not the point here). I don't know which theory is correct of course. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
