Hal, Allright. You are saying that incompleteness is the (only) motivator of the members. In other words the members feel motivated by incompleteness. They do have the feeling of being incomplete that motivates their behavior. Is this correct? George
Hal Ruhl wrote: >Hi George: > >I see no motivator to any dynamics within the Everything other than >the incompleteness of some of its members and the unavoidable >necessity to progressively resolve this incompleteness. > >Hal Ruhl > >At 12:29 AM 1/17/2008, you wrote: > > > >>Hal Ruhl wrote: >> >> >> >>>This is an automatic process like a mass has to answer to the forces >>>[meaningful questions] applied to it. >>> >>> >>What in the psyche of the mass makes it answer to the forces? >> >>George >> >> >> >> > >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---