Hi George: I see no "feeling" of anything in a Something. There is only an absence of the information needed to answer meaningful questions that are asked and must is be answered.
Hal Ruhl At 11:13 PM 1/17/2008, you wrote: >Hal, >Allright. You are saying that incompleteness is the (only) motivator >of the members. In other words the members feel motivated by >incompleteness. They do have the feeling of being incomplete that >motivates their behavior. Is this correct? >George > >Hal Ruhl wrote: >> >>Hi George: >> >>I see no motivator to any dynamics within the Everything other than >>the incompleteness of some of its members and the unavoidable >>necessity to progressively resolve this incompleteness. >> >>Hal Ruhl >> >>At 12:29 AM 1/17/2008, you wrote: >> >> >>> >>>Hal Ruhl wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>>This is an automatic process like a mass has to answer to the forces >>>>[meaningful questions] applied to it. >>>> >>> >>> >>>What in the psyche of the mass makes it answer to the forces? >>> >>>George >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
