Hi Brian, Le 13-mai-08, à 02:00, Brian Tenneson a écrit :
> > [...] > To recapitulate, the statement of the idea is this: > [1] > Randomness implies consciousness. I don't see why, or even what this could mean. > The converse appears to be false. Comp (+ Consciousness or just first person perspective) implies (first person) randomness (Cf step 3 of the UDA). > > [2] > SAS implies consciousness. OK (but trivial, imo) > The converse appears to be false. <consider a one-second-old frog, > for example> I think you're a bit unfair with the old frogs ... Best, Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
