On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 07:45:22AM -0700, ronaldheld wrote: > > Bruno: > Since I program in Fortran, I am uncertain how to interpret things. > Ronald
Maybe if he said Fortran IV or Fortran 66, it might have made the point clearer. I know guys who still program in Fortran 66. The rest of us have moved on ... Fortran 95 is not a bad language to program in for instance - and 2003 has some interesting features, although I don't know of any freely available compilers. Personally, I went C++ in the early 90s because g++ was available and the equivalent for Fortran 90 was not (gfortran or g95 arrived by about 2000 IIRC). -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Mathematics UNSW SYDNEY 2052 hpco...@hpcoders.com.au Australia http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
