On 1 Sep, 17:29, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> On 01 Sep 2009, at 18:11, Flammarion wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 1 Sep, 16:34, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> >> On 01 Sep 2009, at 16:53, Flammarion wrote:
>
> >>> That's another version of Platonia and therefore still an
> >>> ontological
> >>> commitment.
>
> >> No, it is the same arithmetical truth, but from the first person
> >> perspective.
>
> > A bottomless stack that has no ontological existence is irrelevant.
> > I can't be implemented by what doesn't exist.
>
> By comp, mainly by Church thesis only, you (in the third person sense)
> are implemented in the mathematical UD. OK?
The mathemaitcal UD doesn't exist.
> The rest, that is that the first person-you-with-qualia appears also
> there, in a highly distributed form, follows from MGA.
>
> Bruno
>
> > Either it is warmed-over Platonia or it is nothing.
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
