On Feb 26, 10:34 am, Brent Meeker <meeke...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > But isn't the EPR experiment a way of avoiding a past constraint. The > past constraint is just that the net angular momentum is zero, so there > is no constraint on the polarization of either photon. When one is > measured it can be thought of as sending a message back to the origin > and forward to the other photon so as to produce the QM correlation. So > the amplification takes place on the other particle in the forward > direction. Of course you can't send a signal via a correlation. Here's > a good discussion of this and some other retrocausation ideas by William > Wharton:
Good point. (Mind you, that link you posted doesn't seem quite right! :-) Should it be this? http://www.fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/Wharton_time_and_causality.pdf -- it looks interesting, anyway!) Charles -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
