On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 12:19:28AM -0400, Stephen Paul King wrote: > My argument is that the traditional notion of a measure does not apply > because we cannot assume the simultaneous co-reliability of OMs, thus the DA > is an artifact of misapplied statistics. >
The traditional DA does not refer to OMs at all. Sometimes I say that the SSA is an absolute measure on birth OMs, but this is a manner of speaking for connecting the SSA with the various forms of SSSA. But in reality, the SSA does not need the concept of OM. That is why I'm wondering if you really have in mind Mallah's argument against QTI, rather than the traditional DA. If that's what you're thinking, I'll go back over what you've written with that in mind. Cheers -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Professor of Mathematics hpco...@hpcoders.com.au University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
