On 5/29/2012 9:06 PM, Aleksandr Lokshin wrote:
It is a question of terminology. If you say "a function" it is necessary to construct it (from physical point of view). But, physically it is impossible to do so.

It is certainly physically possible for me to consider the class of persons with no feet. Whether I have an operational test for "no feet" or whether I can apply it a billion times or infinitely many times is irrelevant. The function is defined, i.e. made definite. It is not "physically constructed" whatever that may mean because the function is not a physical object.

I say "choice", because when proving some theorem we already say : "let us consider/choose an arbitrary x belonging to X".

No, we say "for every x an element of X" or "for any x, an element of X". Maybe you should just stop saying "choose/consider".

Brent

If you say "function" it is all the same. You give another name to your infinitely/finitely repeated choice.
Alexander

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:52 AM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net <mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>> wrote:

    On 5/29/2012 8:11 PM, Aleksandr Lokshin wrote:
    The original poster introduces what free will means.
    1) Every choice which is allowed in physics is a random choice or a 
determinate one.
    2) If human free will choice exists, it is agreed that it is not determined 
by some
    law and is not a random process.
    3)We have agfeed that the choice of "an arbitrary element" is not a random 
chaice
    and is not a choice determinate by some law.

    We haven't even agreed that it is a choice.  It's just using a function, as 
in (. is
an element of X) so (x is an element of X)->true and (y is an element of X)->false. (all x |x an element of X) doesn't involve choosing an element x, just specifying a
    function that defines X.  Then it is a "choice determinate by some law."  
And
    whether X is infinite or finite is a red herring.  Suppose I said,"Consider 
an
    arbitrary person with no feet. Then he has no toenails."  This is a 
perfectly valid
    inference whether there are finitely many or infinitely many persons in the 
multiverse.

    Brent


    4)Therefore I do call it "a free will choice in mathematics". One can 
consider it
    as a definition of a specific "free will choice in mathematics".
    5) If one uses mathematics, then one operates with a process which is 
prohibited in
    physics. Therefore an investigator who uses mathematics cannot deny 
existence of
    mental processes which cannot be described by physics (and, in particular, 
cannot
    deny existence of free will, even if "free will" is not introduced 
explicitly).
    Good luck.



    On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net
    <mailto:stephe...@charter.net>> wrote:

        On 5/29/2012 2:09 PM, Joseph Knight wrote:


        On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:52 PM, John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com
        <mailto:johnkcl...@gmail.com>> wrote:


            On Sun, May 27, 2012  Aleksandr Lokshin <aaloks...@gmail.com
            <mailto:aaloks...@gmail.com>> wrote:

                > All main mathematical notions ( such as infinity, variable, 
integer
                number) implicitly
depend on the notion of free will.

            Because nobody can explain what the ASCII string "free will" means 
the
            above statement is of no value.


        Precisely. The original poster should introduce some sensible 
definition of
        free will. Good luck!


            The "belief" in a particular perceived outcome given some state of 
affairs?


-- Onward!

        Stephen

        "Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
        ~ Francis Bacon

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
        "Everything List" group.
        To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
        <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>.
        To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
        everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
        <mailto:everything-list%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
        For more options, visit this group at
        http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.


-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
    "Everything List" group.
    To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
    <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>.
    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
    <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
    For more options, visit this group at
    http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
    "Everything List" group.
    To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
    <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>.
    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
    <mailto:everything-list%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
    For more options, visit this group at
    http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to