On 8/16/2012 7:00 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
[SPK] You do not have an explanation of interactions in COMP
[BM]
I have only the quantum logic. This does not change the vaility of the
reasoning. You reason like that, Darwin theory fail to predict the
mass of the boson, and string theory ignore the problem of how doing a
tasting pizza, so those theories are flawed. Comp explains already the
quanta and the qualia, but not yet time, space, real numbers, nor
pizza and boson. Works for next generations.
Dear Bruno,
Your example of Darwin's theory is deeply flawed, if only because
Darwin's theory does not implicitly or explicitly make claims about the
ontological status of entities. Yours does! You claim that you don't
need to postulate a physical world and yet the presentation of the
theory itself requires a physical world, at least to communicate it
between our minds. A physical world provides the means to communicate
between us, without it nothing occurs. There are no interactions
definable without it and therefore comp's explanations are void and
muted by your insistence that matter and physicality has to be primitive
to be involved.
I am only asking you to consider the possibility that both matter
and numbers are on the same (non-primitive) level.
--
Onward!
Stephen
"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
~ Francis Bacon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
