On 19 Dec 2012, at 13:04, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Dear Bruno,
Excuse if i don´t address your question.
"I define good as that which enhances life and evil
as that which diminishes it"
That is also my definition. Going a step further, good is
tautological and absolute, in the same way that is evil: what is
good lives,
What is evil, perishes, The evil may recover itself from past
defeats by ever recreating itself in new forms. The good stay and
get transmitted from generation to generation by our genes and our
memes. So it is in our nous, accessible to everyone.
OK. That Roger's definition, but in human science there are always
exceptional counter-example, like I illustrate with the prolife
doctor. Enhancing life might depends on what we call life. Seventy
years in a hospital surrounded by machines and tubes might not be an
improvement, from the pov of some people.
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
