On 20 Jan 2013, at 20:44, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/20/2013 3:41 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I agree. It is always better to stick to the most common sense of
the words.
That's funny coming from a guy who used "God" to designate abstract
computations.
?
God, matter, consciousness are never computable. Where did I ever used
"God" to designate computations. It seems to me that I insist a lot
for not making that kind of spurious identification.
I have identified, in the comp context, "God" with Arithmetical Truth,
explaining why it makes "God" unnameable by machines.
Computation are Sigma_1
Truth is Sigma_1 union Sigma_2 union Sigma_3 union Sigma_4 union ...
You are a bit quick here, Brent,
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
