IMHO more than one universe per entity is unjustified.


On 1/31/2013 8:09 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
IMHO more than one universe is unjustified.

    ----- Receiving the following content -----
    *From:* Telmo Menezes <mailto:te...@telmomenezes.com>
    *Receiver:* everything-list <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>
    *Time:* 2013-01-30, 12:10:08
    *Subject:* Re: About the Infinite Repetition of Histories in Space

    Hi Roger,

    I find it harder to believe in finite universes. Why the precise
    number, whatever it is?


    On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Roger Clough
    <rclo...@verizon.net <mailto:rclo...@verizon.net>> wrote:

        Hi Stephen P. King
        �
        It's easier to believe in salvation through faith or UFOs than
        infinite universes.
        �
        �

            ----- Receiving the following content -----
            *From:* Stephen P. King <mailto:stephe...@charter.net>
            *Receiver:* everything-list
            <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>
            *Time:* 2013-01-28, 09:20:33
            *Subject:* About the Infinite Repetition of Histories in Space

            Hi,

            牋� I think this paper might be fodder for a nice discussion!

            http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.5295


              About the Infinite Repetition of Histories in Space

            Francisco Jos� Soler Gil
            <http://arxiv.org/find/physics/1/au:+Gil_F/0/1/0/all/0/1>,�Manuel
            Alfonseca
            <http://arxiv.org/find/physics/1/au:+Alfonseca_M/0/1/0/all/0/1>
            (Submitted on 22 Jan 2013 (v1
            <http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.5295v1>), last revised 23 Jan
            2013 (this version, v2))

                This paper analyzes two different proposals, one by
                Ellis and Brundrit, based on classical relativistic
                cosmology, the other by Garriga and Vilenkin, based on
                the DH interpretation of quantum mechanics, both of
                which conclude that, in an infinite universe, planets
                and living beings must be repeated an infinite number
                of times. We point to some possible shortcomings in
                the arguments of these authors. We conclude that the
                idea of an infinite repetition of histories in space
                cannot be considered strictly speaking a consequence
                of current physics and cosmology. Such ideas should be
                seen rather as examples of {\guillemotleft}ironic
                science{\guillemotright} in the terminology of John
                Horgan.



--
Onward!

Stephen

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to