On 12/27/2013 7:54 PM, LizR wrote:
On 28 December 2013 16:44, Stephen Paul King <stephe...@provensecure.com
<mailto:stephe...@provensecure.com>> wrote:
Hi Jason,
"The first, second, 10th, 1,000,000th, and 10^100th, and 10^100^100th state
of the
UD's execution are mathematical facts ..." Umm, how? Godel and Matiyasevich
would
disagree! If there does not exist a program that can evaluate whether or
not a UD
substring is a faithful representation of a "true theorem", then how is it "a
fact"?
The UD is deterministic. Part of Bruno's point is to explain apparent randomness without
having to assume any. Any computational state reached by the UD is a "true theorem" of
whichever program it is executing.
Brent
That depends on whether the UD is deterministic or not. If it is, then, its Nth state is
a fact. (It doesn't need to be run or evaluated, and the Nth state may be a fact that
nobody knows, like the googolth digit of pi, assuming no one's worked that out.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything
List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
