On 1/11/2014 9:33 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear LizR,
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 12:00 AM, LizR <lizj...@gmail.com
<mailto:lizj...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 12 January 2014 14:52, Stephen Paul King <stephe...@provensecure.com
<mailto:stephe...@provensecure.com>> wrote:
Dear LizR,
That is the claim and I show that it is false. A class that has a
particular
set of properties and not the rest of the properties required to
"balance it all
out to Nothing" is not neutral. It is biased!
So, can't arithmetic be balanced out to nothing? What can?
Of course arithmetic be balanced out to nothing! By the class of physical objects and
their actions! They are what it isn't. Is this not making sense? I don't see how it is
complicated...
Doesn't make sense to me. What does "balanced out to nothing" mean?...like the net
mass-energy of the universe is zero, the negative gravitational potential just balancing
the matter (which seems to be true)? Or the total information may be zero if we could
count the negative contributions beyond the Hubble sphere?
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
