Stephen, No, it's not static relations between numbers, it's an active computational process.
If just static relations between numbers your mouth would just be hanging open forever in the same look of shock... Edgar On Thursday, January 16, 2014 9:48:44 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > Dear Edgar, > > > What mouth? It is only the relations between numbers! > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Edgar L. Owen <edga...@att.net<javascript:> > > wrote: > > Stephen, > > It's amazing how much your mouth has to move to tell me it's not moving! > > Edgar > > > On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 7:55:09 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > Dear Edgar, > > Bingo! You are correct. All motion in space-time is an illusion. The > ancient greeks figured that out already. > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Edgar L. Owen <edga...@att.net> wrote: > > Stephen, > > If time doesn't move then nothing moves. > > Edgar > > > > On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 7:48:02 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > Dear Edgar, > > Time is not the movement of the hands or numbers of a clock, it is the > measure of the mapping between the positions of the hands. That is not > "motion", it is something else. Time does not move. > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Edgar L. Owen <edga...@att.net> wrote: > > Stephen, > > "Time does not move"??? Even your clock knows better than that! And you > think my theories are weird! > > Edgar > > > > On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 7:35:26 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > Dear Bot, > > Time does not move. Please alert your programer that your libraries of > responses are failing to achieve the predicted response. Get new ones. > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Edgar L. Owen <edga...@att.net> wrote: > > Stephen, > > c is actually the speed of TIME as the STc equation makes clear. It just > so happens that light, having no velocity in time, always travels at the > speed of time in all observers' frames thorough SPACE. All its spacetime > velocity is only through space. > > I didn't say anything travels faster than c. Why claim that? > > Edgar > > > > On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 7:14:56 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > Dear Edgar, > > Your argument is based on a disconception of what the speed of light is! > Light -photons- do not "move" at all. They are the null length "rays" that > connect events together. Nothing can travel faster than c because to do so > would be traveling in less than zero distances. > A light cone is defined as those events that are "connected" by the null > rays. You really need to go back to the books and work the math to learn > and understand w > > ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
