On 1/16/2014 1:48 AM, LizR wrote:
On 16 January 2014 20:00, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net <mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>> wrote:

    On 1/15/2014 7:08 PM, LizR wrote:
    On 16 January 2014 14:11, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net
    <mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>> wrote:


        You can do that (in fact it may have been done).  You have two emitters 
with
        polarizers and a detector at which you post-select only those particles 
that
        arrive and form a singlet.  Then you will find that the correlation 
counts for
        that subset violates Bell's inequality for polarizer settings of 30, 
60, 120deg.

    I assume that means Price's (and Bell's) assumption that violations of 
Bell's
    inequality can be explained locally and realistically with time symmetry is
    definitely wrong...?

    ?? Why do you conclude that?  It's the time-reverse of the EPR that 
violated BI.

Because as I (perhaps mis-) understand it, Price claims that we need to take both past AND future boundary conditions into account to explain EPR with time symmetry. If we can explain it with only a forward in time or backward in time explanation, then we aren't using both.

But in the reverse EPR we are in effect using both past and future boundary conditions. At the emitters we set the polarizers - that's the past boundary condition. At the single detector we post-select only those incoming pairs that form a net-zero spin; so that's a future boundary condition.

This is only a 'thought experiment' because I don't think there's any practical way to capture and test pairs for net-zero spin. Note that you must NOT measure the spins, you have to select the net-zero pair without measuring either one.

Brent


Or I may be missing the point. That often happens. Now that I think about it, I probably am. I shall go into the garden and eat worms, and while I tuck in maybe you could explain to me whether I jumped to completely the wrong conclusion.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to