On 1/16/2014 4:02 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Yes, that's my point. Price make a logical point, though. But we have to abandon QM for
QM + a lot of extra-information to select one reality.
In that case why not come back to Ptolemeaus. The idea that it is the sun which moves in
the sky is consistent too, even with Newton physics, if you put enough extra-data in the
theory.
It's not only consistent it is so in the frame used when modeling the galaxy. Because the
physics is invariant under various transforms one always transforms so as to make the
problem easier.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
