Ghibbsa, Well yes, basically that's it. The question I have is why we have to choose one frame over the other to get the correct results.
Edgar On Friday, February 7, 2014 5:17:41 PM UTC-5, ghi...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Friday, February 7, 2014 10:04:42 PM UTC, Edgar L. Owen wrote: >> >> Ghibbsa, >> >> I'm not sure that works because it assumes there is an absolute space >> background (sort of like the aether) defined by the NON-rotating center of >> the earth. Why would that be the case? In other words what is that "hell of >> a lot faster" motion relative too, and why do we choose that frame as the >> correct/absolute one? >> >> Edgar >> > > My concern is that your questions are going beyond my personal knowledge > of relativity which isn't much. But, at risk of not addressing the > distinctiveness of what you have just said to me (if I don't then > apologies), I could try restating what I just said, but slightly > differently. > > - gravity is geometric > > - two objects at different distances from a massive body, in geosychronous > orbit relative to eachother, are not the same frame in relativity, because > one is moving faster relative to the speed of the other. Because that's the > only way to get geosynchronous situation. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
