You make some excellent points. And pardon me for not recognizing my own model.
JR From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2014 3:07 PM To: everything-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE On 9 June 2014 06:19, John Ross <jr...@trexenterprises.com> wrote: Tronnies are each a point focus of Coulomb forces. Are you saying tronnies aren't particles, but excitations of this Coulomb field? Actually this implies that only the field exists, tronnies are just a convenient way of indicating where it's strongest. (Assuming they have no mass, at least, as you say.) Coulomb forces spread out from this focus point in all directions at the speed of light. The tronnies travel in circles at speeds of (π/2)c so each tronnie is always at the focus of its own Coulomb force waves directed along the diameter of its circle. By the time the tronnie has completed one cycle its coulomb forces have completed 360 degrees. In entrons the tronnies cycle at frequencies of about 1.5 billion cycles per second to about 160 trillion trillion cycles per second (160 X 1024 cyc/s). "At the focus" for point particles implies infinite precision. How do you deal with perturbations if your model needs infinite precision to work? I don’ know what they detected. I don’t think they know. My guess is they detected high-energy protons, maybe some high-energy anti-protons, high-energy electrons, high-energy positrons and high-energy entrons. They may have detected some neutrino entrons, but these babies are very hard to detect. I understand that they think they detected some neutrinos in an underground neutrino detector many miles from Cern. These were probably neutrino photons. You need to be able to at least explain existing results for your model to be taken seriously. I have not done the math to demonstrate all the forces acting within an alpha particle and between alpha particles. I invite all readers to do the math. Actually, the math may not be too complicated. We know the exact path of the protons and the electrons within the alpha particle. We can probably assume that in the carbon nucleus the alpha particles are approximately stationary, since carbon-12 has zero spin. Well, it really should be up to you to do the maths. I believe Einstein had to learn a new branch of maths to formulate General Relativity. You at least need to produce equations which describe the system under consideration, which other people may be able to solve for particular cases. I don’t know how to do computer modeling. Again I invite all readers that can do computer modeling based on my model. If you are the first to prove I am right, you may be in for a big prize. You could pay a programmer, as long as you have some equations, they can apply them to a model of a suitable system. I think what you do is create, say, a couple of tronnies as data structures, and then apply the equations of motion to them over and over again and see what path they trace out under their mutual attraction. My guess is that (like the famous weather simulation that was important in bringing chaos theory into existence) you won't get a stable result, because the floating-point numbers you have to use to describe the tronnies' positions have limited precision. Personally I don't think a theory that requires infinite precision can work, because nature doesn't seem to be infinitely precise. So this would be a valid test, imho - does the system fall down when simulated? (You can I believe get any finite amount of precision in your simulation, the calculations just take longer for higher precision.) I don’t understand RM and virtual practice. RM = Ross Model (in an effort to save wear and tear on my typing fingers). "Virtual practice" meant you could see your model working in practice - except that it wouldn't be what we normally mean by in practice (in the real world) but in a simulation. Hence "VP". :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
