After reading lots of repeats by otherwise smart people on the topic: do we have a concensus on this list (narrow target enough?) about some identification of * intelligence? * (forget Wiki!)
I proposed the* 'inter-lego'* classic, meaning to *"read"* (=understand act out, apply, etc.) the meanings BETWEEN the exactly worded lines (not as exactly spelled out verbatim). It requires a WIDER view, some anticipatory talent maybe, some combinatorical capability and so on). There was not too much appreciation (indeed: no reflections at all). On *'artificial'* I have a weaker opinion: in our usage of language the word directs my mind towards *'speculative'* - as both man-confounded, or contraption-erected results - or both. (I wonder why 'my mind' does avert from the* 'naturally grown'* as artificial? Indeed Mme.Nature is also just human. Or so we think. Maybe I would lose my agnostic wisdom (ha ha) of unknowable and unfathomable pressures directing the *CHANGE* in the world). So: are we ready to vote for 'intelligence'? (Not the CIA, mind you!). John M -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
