On 9/23/2014 1:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
This is isn't necessarily wrong, but as an argument it leaves a big gap.
You might elaborate. There is an unavoidable gap about consciousness, but if you accept
the definition and computationalism, the gap is entirely explained, indeed by the G*
minus G non-empty annulus and its intensional variants. But may be you allude to some
other gap, in which case I would be happy to make it more precise.
I don't refer to the unavoidable gap, but to the gap between having an inner narrative and
being able to do universal computation. I don't see entailment in either direction.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
