On 06 Oct 2014, at 20:15, meekerdb wrote:

Here's an interesting interview of a philosopher who is interested in the question of whether God exists. The interesting thing about it, for this list, is that "God" is implicitly the god of theism, and is not "one's reason for existence" or "the unprovable truths of arithmetic".

How do you know that? How could you know that. IF comp is true, and if Christianism is true, the meeting with St-Ptere and the "dogma" of the Church might well be among the unprovable truth (unprovable by you and similar) of arithmetic. I doubt this, of course, but we just don't know. What is true and even provable, is that if we are consistent, in that case the discourse of the christians should be mute on this, and the Christians should just trust God for the advertising. So the behavior of some Christians might be inconsistent with arithmetic, but not necessarily the doctrine. But then the behavior of most institutionalized religion is already inconsistent or unsound with arithmetic, and the institutionalization is consistent like the provability of the false is consistent (but unsound) with arithmetic. That would mean that institutionalization *is* the theological trap that the machines already warn us against.

Bruno




Brent


-------- Original Message --------



http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/10/05/can-wanting-to-believe-make-us-believers/


Gary Gutting: "This is the 12th and last in a series of interviews about religion that I am conducting for The Stone. The interviewee for this installment is Daniel Garber, a professor of philosophy at Princeton University, specializing in philosophy and science in the period of Galileo and Newton. In a week or two, I'll conclude with a wrap-up column on the series."

...

Daniel Garber: "Certainly there are serious philosophers who would deny that the arguments for the existence of God have been decisively refuted. But even so, my impression is that proofs for the existence of God have ceased to be a matter of serious discussion outside of the domain of professional philosophy of religion. And even there, my sense is that the discussions are largely a matter of academic interest: The real passion has gone out of the question."

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to