On Saturday, November 8, 2014 3:55:43 AM UTC, Liz R wrote:
>
> On 8 November 2014 11:50, <zib...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>>
>> Sure, but in the same vein as where Peter goes, photosynthesis in this 
>> universe always finds the most efficient path where there are many others. 
>> I have'n't heard an answer to that yet, that addresses significance proper. 
>>   We're getting preference every time. Have a go at that:O)
>>
>> I would need more information about how photosynthesis finds the most 
> efficient path before I can answer that. Quantum immortality involves 
> things which are incredibly unlikely, like a spontaneous quantum jup of all 
> the atoms in your body, or similarly possible but 
> more-than-astronomically-unlikely scenarios. I doubt if photosynthesis has 
> a 1 in a googolplex chance of working!
>

 I thought there might be a criteria for perhaps a personal falsification 
of MWI for anyone wanting to be in that space. Isn't the fact 
photosynthesis occurs on a vast scale in terms of these events, and it 
would seem always involves the most efficient path. 

Doesn't that require a large number of universes never to get that path 
Some perhaps get the 2nd most efficient and so on? 

That sounds like grounds for serious question mark over MWI. Or do I have 
this wrong? 

In regard what you said you'd need to know more about. Well....if it's an 
opportunity to resolve a huge matter in your worldview it might be worth 
your while. 

Just for entertainment, the Popperians on FoR ran multiyear rackets 
involving apparently giving reasonable responses to basically knock down 
science wiped large sections of their worldview off the table. They say 
what they'd need to know more about. And make a long list. 

And of course no one was going to bother doing that work for them. So the 
same things would come around and get the same responses. For years. It 
would be hard to see a good theory that didn't involve dishonest and 
insincere behaviour around that. 

It was an entertaining racket on many occasions, for me, I have to admit. 

NOT suggesting a parallel here. But you can see the issues. Would it settle 
something important for you? If so, is there a case to find out what you 
need to know. I don't know the answer. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to