On 03 Aug 2015, at 18:51, John Clark wrote:

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote: ​

​>​>>​ ​​ ​Then you die with the simple teleportation.

​​>> ​Then who will die in ​the simple teleportation​?

​> ​You, when you are in Helsinki.

​For the sake of clarity and consistency when dealing with this topic John Clark humbly requests that ​Bruno Marchal make the following simple changes in future correspondence with John Clark:

1) Substitute "John Clark" for the personal pronoun "you".

We have explained to you that the key is in the difference between 1- Clark and 3-Clark, or 1-you and 3-you, or 1-me and 3-me. not in the use of names and pronouns.


2) Keep in mind that after the duplication there is no such thing as *THE* 1p that John Clark will experience in the future. Thank you for your cooperation.

Yes, but we have refuted this. Indeed all your copies refute that prediction, as anyone able to read can see.

You are continuing your rhetorical tricks.







​> ​it is not abaout the lmocation of your bodies, but about the first person experience

​There are two ​first person experiences, which one is Bruno talking about?

We have shown that P((W & ~M) v (M & ~W)) = 1, for the exact same reason that P(coffee) = 1.

So you can be sure (modulo the hypothesis and the protocole) that you will have a unique experience of seeing a unique city after pushing the button. "The" refers to that unique experience. "unique" from the 1-pov, of course, as from the 3-1 view, they are not unique. But they $are* unique from the 1-pov, ad as the question is about that 1-pov prediction, it makes sense to refer to it.




​> ​that you will live (again, with that non ambiguous definition of identity that we have agree on).

​The definition John Clark agreed on is "you" ​is somebody who remembers being a man in Helsinki. On Monday Wednesday and Friday Bruno agrees with this definition, on Tuesday Thursday and Saturday Bruno does not, and on Sunday Bruno is a bit confused.

Lies. The same definition is used for the person. The difference you see is when we address the question, we need to emphasize the 1p refered to in the question.




​> ​You avoid to answer the question/ What do you expect to live after pushing the button.

​Avoid the question my ass! Just yesterday John Clark said clear ​ as a bell "that depends on who "you" is. John Clark would know that in the future the Moscow Man would see Moscow and the Washington Man would see Washington. ​[...] And I ​[John Clark] ​also knew which one would be which, I knew the Moscow Man would get his photons from Moscow and the Washington Man would get his photons from Washington. ​[...] ​what Bruno Marchal would expect John Clark neither knows nor cares because expectations, correct ones or incorrect ones, have nothing to do with the continuity of consciousness or the unique feeling of self.​"​

You make my point by avoiding the question again and again and again. I think it is hopeless, as you just avoid systematically the question.

You are in Helsinki, you will push the button. The question is what do you expect to live as first person experience?

- I expect to die.
- I expect to feel myself in two cities at once.
- I expect to feel myself in only one city.

I recall you that we have agreed on the identity criterion (remembering Helsinki and the personal pushing on the button), and the definition of the first person experience (here it is just remembering it and its description in the personal diary). This leads, assuming computationalism of course (or more general), only one option above open, as the diaries of both copies confirmed (for people able to read).

Bruno









   ​> ​you and Peck are the only one having a problem here.

​Then Peck and Clark are the only ones here who can think rationally ​on this subject.

​> ​You are just playing with word.

​And you are using words like a naive ​child not like a logician with a disciplined mind.

​John K Clark ​



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to