On 21 Nov 2017, at 21:57, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Bruce Kellett <bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
> wrote:
. >> Does non locality mean the future influences the past as
Clark alleged?
> No.
"realism plus arrow of time preservation and quantum mechanics
are not compatible. In other words, quantum mechanics cannot be
completed with any (local or non-local) hidden variables, provide we
assume the common sense of the arrow of time."
https://arxiv.org/abs/0806.2037
Interesting, but again, that paper assume one world, and use some
notion of simultaneous (space-like separated) outcomes, which I am not
even sure can make any sense in a relativistic quantum mechanics
(without collapse).
My feeling is that Everett relative state theory prevents "non-
locality" to make any sense in realms which mix special (and general)
relativity.
Bruno
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
