> On 15 Aug 2018, at 16:26, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 11:49:04 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> 
>> On 15 Aug 2018, at 12:36, agrays...@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 10:22:40 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com 
>> <http://gmail.com/> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 9:58:57 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> 
>> > On 14 Aug 2018, at 22:12, Brent Meeker <meek...@verizon.net <>> wrote: 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On 8/14/2018 3:54 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: 
>> >> How do you explain interference fringes in the two slits? How do you 
>> >> explain the different behaviour of u+d and a mixture of u and d. 
>> >> 
>> >> If the wave is not real, how doe it interfere even when we are not there? 
>> > 
>> > How does it interfere with itself unless it goes through both slits in the 
>> > same world...thus being non-local. 
>> 
>> The wave is a trans-world notion. You should better see it as a wave of 
>> histories/worlds, than a wave in one world. I don’t think “one world” is 
>> well defined enough to make sense in both Everett and Mechanism. 
>> 
>> If you start with the error tGhat all possible results of a measurement must 
>> be realized, you can't avoid many worlds. Then, if you fall in love with the 
>> implications of this error, you are firmly in woo-woo land with the prime 
>> directive of bringing as many as possible into this illusion / delusion. 
>> This is where we're at IMO. AG
>> 
>> Truthfully, I don't know why, when you do a slit experiment one particle at 
>> a time, the result is quantum interference. It might be because particles 
>> move as waves and each particle goes through both slits. In any event, I 
>> don't see the MWI is a solution to this problem. It just takes us down a 
>> deeper rabbit hole. AG
> 
> Everything is in the formalism, as well exemplified by the two slits. If you 
> miss this, then consider the quantum algorithm by Shor. There, a “particle” 
> is not just going through two slits, but participate in parallel, yet 
> different computations, and we get an indirect evidence by the information we 
> can extract from a quantum Fourier transform on all results obtained in the 
> parallel branches. 
> 
> No. It's all nonsense. AG 

It is elementary quantum computing. You can take just Deutsch problem, or 
Deutsch Josza problem. Deutsch “invented” that problem to show that the 
many-worlds are testable. Of course, that can give only an indication, and if 
we assume QM is correct, that is not much more than the two slits. QM without 
collapse is the same as the many-worlds. Superpositions just never disappear 
when there is no collapse. 

Bruno




> 
> If you can explain all this without FTL in one unique physical reality, then 
> write a paper and publish, you will be famous.
> 
> Bruno
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>  
>> 
>> Bruno 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> > 
>> > Brent 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> > "Everything List" group. 
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> > email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com <>. 
>> > To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com <>. 
>> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
>> > <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>. 
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>> > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
>> <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to