On 8/17/2018 1:50 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Aug 2018, at 20:45, Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net
<mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>> wrote:
On 8/16/2018 3:05 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
You seem to reintroduce implicitly some collapse in the picture.
That’s my feeling, as this is not clear. When measuring a spin:
there are two possible values *for all possible direction of the spin*.
For all possible directions of the spin /*measurement*/. There is
nothing about Alice or Bob that makes all directions /*possible*/
except in the classical sense of "possible”.
That is what I said.
No it's not. You wrote, "for all possible direction of the spin" which
constitutes a full circle. But Alice's choice of direction is a
classical event determined by the classical computations of her brain.
It does not have rotational symmetry. But you seem to treat the problem
as if she does and that there is some infinity of Alice's which together
have rotational symmetry.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
